On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:38:34 -0500
Paulraj, Sandeep s-paul...@ti.com wrote:
Scott,
Is it ok if I add this to my tree?
Yes, once the whitespace is fixed.
Its part of a 11 patch series and a total of some 20 patches submitted by
Steve
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c |7
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Paulraj, Sandeep s-paul...@ti.com wrote:
This printk was added recently and results in ugly output on systems
with no NAND:
NAND: nand_get_flash_type: unknown NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x00,
Chip ID: 0x00 0 MiB
instead of:
NAND: 0 MiB
Hello.
On 02-09-2010 19:33, Steve Sakoman wrote:
This printk was added recently and results in ugly output on systems
with no NAND:
NAND: nand_get_flash_type: unknown NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x00, Chip
ID: 0x00 0 MiB
instead of:
NAND: 0 MiB
Signed-off-by: Steve
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Sergei Shtylyov sshtyl...@mvista.com wrote:
Hello.
On 02-09-2010 19:33, Steve Sakoman wrote:
This printk was added recently and results in ugly output on systems
with no NAND:
NAND: nand_get_flash_type: unknown NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x00, Chip
ID:
This printk was added recently and results in ugly output on systems
with no NAND:
NAND: nand_get_flash_type: unknown NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x00,
Chip ID: 0x00 0 MiB
instead of:
NAND: 0 MiB
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman st...@sakoman.com
Steve,
A proper patch would be
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 12:38 -0500, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
This printk was added recently and results in ugly output on systems
with no NAND:
NAND: nand_get_flash_type: unknown NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x00,
Chip ID: 0x00 0 MiB
instead of:
NAND: 0 MiB
This printk was added recently and results in ugly output on systems
with no NAND:
NAND: nand_get_flash_type: unknown NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x00, Chip
ID: 0x00 0 MiB
instead of:
NAND: 0 MiB
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman st...@sakoman.com
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c |7
7 matches
Mail list logo
