On 31.01.2012 19:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote:
Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select
to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command:
U-Boot sf probe
instead of the more
On 02/02/2012 17:32, Mike Frysinger wrote:
to be clear, i'm not trying to hoard patches or anything ...
Do not worry, I have never thought this... ;-)
i just can't see there being a hard requirement here between the
two sets.
Agree, and the patches should be merged by the maintainer
On 01/02/2012 20:31, Eric Nelson wrote:
Hi Mike,
My comment was the inverse: I can't test just the 'sf probe' updates
unless I
have the core SPI flash support for mx6qsabrelite.
AFAIK, the update to cmd_sf doesn't have any dependencies and of course
the README update doesn't.
Then I
On 02/02/2012 02:18 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 01/02/2012 20:31, Eric Nelson wrote:
Hi Mike,
My comment was the inverse: I can't test just the 'sf probe' updates
unless I
have the core SPI flash support for mx6qsabrelite.
AFAIK, the update to cmd_sf doesn't have any dependencies and of
On Thursday 02 February 2012 04:18:45 Stefano Babic wrote:
On 01/02/2012 20:31, Eric Nelson wrote:
My comment was the inverse: I can't test just the 'sf probe' updates
unless I have the core SPI flash support for mx6qsabrelite.
AFAIK, the update to cmd_sf doesn't have any dependencies
On 31/01/2012 20:14, Eric Nelson wrote:
On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote:
Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select
to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command:
On 01.02.2012 12:30, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 31/01/2012 20:14, Eric Nelson wrote:
On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote:
Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select
to be specified by board headers.
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 06:30:04 Stefano Babic wrote:
On 31/01/2012 20:14, Eric Nelson wrote:
On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote:
Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and
chip-select
to be
On 02/01/2012 10:00 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 06:30:04 Stefano Babic wrote:
On 31/01/2012 20:14, Eric Nelson wrote:
On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote:
Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 14:31:39 Eric Nelson wrote:
On 02/01/2012 10:00 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 06:30:04 Stefano Babic wrote:
On 31/01/2012 20:14, Eric Nelson wrote:
On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06
Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select
to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command:
U-Boot sf probe
instead of the more cumbersome usage when a GPIO is tacked onto
the chip-select. Otherwise, this command-line would be needed
to
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote:
Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select
to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command:
U-Boot sf probe
instead of the more cumbersome usage when a GPIO is tacked onto
the
On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote:
Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select
to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command:
U-Boot sf probe
instead of the more
13 matches
Mail list logo
