On Friday, October 10, 2014 at 04:35:11 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> On 9 October 2014 20:26, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> What about [1], this is where we can source the more exotic toolchains
> >> from, can we not? I think it was even
Hi,
On 9 October 2014 20:26, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
>> What about [1], this is where we can source the more exotic toolchains from,
>> can we not? I think it was even you who pointed me to this site and it really
>> is a nice one ;-)
>>
>> [1
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> What about [1], this is where we can source the more exotic toolchains from,
> can we not? I think it was even you who pointed me to this site and it really
> is a nice one ;-)
>
> [1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/
Exactly, the
On Friday, October 10, 2014 at 04:00:00 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On 9 October 2014 17:59, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 08:04:29 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi Marek,
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > [..]
> >
> >> > I mean more continuous integration (build tes
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> It's not really the builder that is the problem - we have one. It's
> all the different toolchains that no one knows about. I still can't
> build all the boards successfully.
Aren't all the toolchains U-boot need included in the make.cross sc
Hi,
On 9 October 2014 20:06, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
>> I agree that buildman solves the CI part nicely, but we also have the part
>> where one has to install the myriad of toolchains for all the architectures
>> to be able to do
Hi Marek,
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> I agree that buildman solves the CI part nicely, but we also have the part
> where one has to install the myriad of toolchains for all the architectures
> to be able to do the compile testing. I wonder if this cannot be made easy
> i
Hi Marek,
On 9 October 2014 17:59, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 08:04:29 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> [..]
>
>> > I mean more continuous integration (build testing) of the code before a
>> > PR is submitted to the ML. Right now, we all do our own
On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 08:04:29 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi Simon,
[..]
> > I mean more continuous integration (build testing) of the code before a
> > PR is submitted to the ML. Right now, we all do our own thing when it
> > comes to testing before PR, but it would be nice t
Hi Marek,
On 9 October 2014 11:32, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 07:03:42 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > On 9 October 2014 10:27, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 06:14:11 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >> Hi Marek,
> > >>
> > >> On 9 O
On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 07:03:42 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On 9 October 2014 10:27, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 06:14:11 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi Marek,
> >>
> >> On 9 October 2014 09:12, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> > On Thursday, October 09,
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:03:02AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 9 October 2014 10:23, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:12:03PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 08:18:14 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On 20 September 2014
Hi Marek,
On 9 October 2014 10:27, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 06:14:11 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On 9 October 2014 09:12, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> > On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 08:18:14 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > On 20 September 2
Hi Tom,
On 9 October 2014 10:23, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:12:03PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 08:18:14 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On 20 September 2014 08:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> > > In some cases we really want to move forw
On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 06:14:11 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On 9 October 2014 09:12, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 08:18:14 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 20 September 2014 08:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > > In some cases we reall
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:12:03PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 08:18:14 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 20 September 2014 08:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > In some cases we really want to move forward with a deregister, add a
> > > force parameter to all
Hi Marek,
On 9 October 2014 09:12, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 08:18:14 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 20 September 2014 08:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > In some cases we really want to move forward with a deregister, add a
> > > force parameter to allow t
On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 08:18:14 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20 September 2014 08:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > In some cases we really want to move forward with a deregister, add a
> > force parameter to allow this, and replace the dev with a nulldev in
> > this case.
> >
> > Si
Hi,
On 20 September 2014 08:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
> In some cases we really want to move forward with a deregister, add a force
> parameter to allow this, and replace the dev with a nulldev in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede
> ---
> common/stdio.c | 13 ++-
Dear Hans de Goede,
Typographical error here:
> --- a/drivers/serial/serial-uclass.c
> +++ b/drivers/serial/serial-uclass.c
> -197,7 +197,7 static int serial_pre_remove(struct
udevice *dev)
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_STDIO_DEREGISTER
> struct serial_dev_priv *upriv = dev->uclass_priv;
In some cases we really want to move forward with a deregister, add a force
parameter to allow this, and replace the dev with a nulldev in this case.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede
---
common/stdio.c | 13 ++---
common/usb_kbd.c | 2 +-
drivers/serial/serial-
21 matches
Mail list logo
