Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
drivers/block/mg_disk.c |9 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/mg_disk.c b/drivers/block/mg_disk.c
index 2198017..c8cc195 100644
--- a/drivers/block/mg_disk.c
+++
Hi Graeme,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
drivers/block/mg_disk.c | 9 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/mg_disk.c
Dear All,
Well I know i have asked this before, but I feel I should ask again
because I didn't like the answer much.
Imagine we change this code to:
ts = time_now_ms() + msec
do {
...
} while (time_since_ms(ts) 0);
That should be legal, right? But I don't think this can work since the
Hi Reinhard,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Reinhard Meyer
u-b...@emk-elektronik.de wrote:
Dear All,
Well I know i have asked this before, but I feel I should ask again
because I didn't like the answer much.
Imagine we change this code to:
ts = time_now_ms() + msec
do {
...
} while
Hi Graeme,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Reinhard,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Reinhard Meyer
u-b...@emk-elektronik.de wrote:
Dear All,
Well I know i have asked this before, but I feel I should ask again
because I didn't like the answer
Hi Simon,
u32 end = time_future_ms(timeout);
do {
...blah...
} while(time_now_ms() end);
...
Actually:
} while (time_passed_ms(end))
Sorry, but I think you've lost me here...
but anyway I agree it is a matter of taste and I'm quite happy with
6 matches
Mail list logo
