Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 04/10] Makefile: allow dm_mmc without of_control
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 02:44:56AM +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote: > Allow for CONFIG_DM_MMC with platform data rather than > CONFIG_OF_CONTROL. > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler Applied to u-boot/next, thanks! -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 04/10] Makefile: allow dm_mmc without of_control
Hi Marcel, On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 18:45, Marcel Ziswiler wrote: > > Allow for CONFIG_DM_MMC with platform data rather than > CONFIG_OF_CONTROL. I don't think we want this. Or put it another way, why do we want this? Can you add a motivation here? Can you use OF_PLATDATA instead? > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler > > --- > > Makefile | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Regards, Simon ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
[U-Boot] [PATCH v1 04/10] Makefile: allow dm_mmc without of_control
Allow for CONFIG_DM_MMC with platform data rather than CONFIG_OF_CONTROL. Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler --- Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 6eb08a5724..eb08aaea75 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_DM_I2C_COMPAT)$(CONFIG_SANDBOX),y) @echo >&2 "" endif ifeq ($(CONFIG_MMC),y) -ifneq ($(CONFIG_DM_MMC)$(CONFIG_OF_CONTROL)$(CONFIG_BLK),yyy) +ifneq ($(CONFIG_DM_MMC)$(CONFIG_BLK),yy) @echo >&2 "= WARNING ==" @echo >&2 "This board does not use CONFIG_DM_MMC. Please update" @echo >&2 "the board to use CONFIG_DM_MMC before the v2019.04 release." -- 2.21.0 ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot