On Sun 08 Sep 2013 09:48:20 BST, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Dear Paul Burton,
On 06.09.13 15:43, Paul Burton wrote:
For SPL builds this is just dead code since we'll only need to read.
Eliminating it results in a significant size reduction for the SPL
binary, which may be critical for certain
Hi Paul,
On Sep 9, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Paul Burton wrote:
On Sun 08 Sep 2013 09:48:20 BST, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Dear Paul Burton,
On 06.09.13 15:43, Paul Burton wrote:
For SPL builds this is just dead code since we'll only need to read.
Eliminating it results in a significant size
Dear Paul Burton,
On 06.09.13 15:43, Paul Burton wrote:
For SPL builds this is just dead code since we'll only need to read.
Eliminating it results in a significant size reduction for the SPL
binary, which may be critical for certain platforms where the binary
size is highly constrained.
For SPL builds this is just dead code since we'll only need to read.
Eliminating it results in a significant size reduction for the SPL
binary, which may be critical for certain platforms where the binary
size is highly constrained.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton paul.bur...@imgtec.com
---
Changes in
Hi Paul,
On Sep 6, 2013, at 4:43 PM, Paul Burton wrote:
For SPL builds this is just dead code since we'll only need to read.
Eliminating it results in a significant size reduction for the SPL
binary, which may be critical for certain platforms where the binary
size is highly constrained.
5 matches
Mail list logo