Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: don't support write erase for SPL builds

2013-09-09 Thread Paul Burton
On Sun 08 Sep 2013 09:48:20 BST, Andreas Bießmann wrote: Dear Paul Burton, On 06.09.13 15:43, Paul Burton wrote: For SPL builds this is just dead code since we'll only need to read. Eliminating it results in a significant size reduction for the SPL binary, which may be critical for certain

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: don't support write erase for SPL builds

2013-09-09 Thread Pantelis Antoniou
Hi Paul, On Sep 9, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Paul Burton wrote: On Sun 08 Sep 2013 09:48:20 BST, Andreas Bießmann wrote: Dear Paul Burton, On 06.09.13 15:43, Paul Burton wrote: For SPL builds this is just dead code since we'll only need to read. Eliminating it results in a significant size

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: don't support write erase for SPL builds

2013-09-08 Thread Andreas Bießmann
Dear Paul Burton, On 06.09.13 15:43, Paul Burton wrote: For SPL builds this is just dead code since we'll only need to read. Eliminating it results in a significant size reduction for the SPL binary, which may be critical for certain platforms where the binary size is highly constrained.

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: don't support write erase for SPL builds

2013-09-06 Thread Paul Burton
For SPL builds this is just dead code since we'll only need to read. Eliminating it results in a significant size reduction for the SPL binary, which may be critical for certain platforms where the binary size is highly constrained. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton paul.bur...@imgtec.com --- Changes in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: don't support write erase for SPL builds

2013-09-06 Thread Pantelis Antoniou
Hi Paul, On Sep 6, 2013, at 4:43 PM, Paul Burton wrote: For SPL builds this is just dead code since we'll only need to read. Eliminating it results in a significant size reduction for the SPL binary, which may be critical for certain platforms where the binary size is highly constrained.