Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spl: add support to booting with ATF

2017-04-04 Thread Kever Yang
Hi, On 04/01/2017 12:22 PM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi, On 28 March 2017 at 08:37, Andre Przywara wrote: Hi, On 28/03/17 15:16, Dan Handley wrote: Hi Kever -Original Message- From: Kever Yang [mailto:kever.y...@rock-chips.com] Sent: 28 March 2017 08:23 Hi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spl: add support to booting with ATF

2017-04-04 Thread Dan Handley
Hi Kever > -Original Message- > From: Kever Yang [mailto:kever.y...@rock-chips.com] > Sent: 28 March 2017 08:23 > > Hi Andre, > > > On 03/23/2017 05:22 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > > Hi Kever, > > > > I was wondering if we really need to copy in all those ATF definitions. > > I think this

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spl: add support to booting with ATF

2017-03-31 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On 28 March 2017 at 08:37, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi, > > On 28/03/17 15:16, Dan Handley wrote: >> Hi Kever >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Kever Yang [mailto:kever.y...@rock-chips.com] >>> Sent: 28 March 2017 08:23 >>> >>> Hi Andre, >>> >>> >>> On

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spl: add support to booting with ATF

2017-03-28 Thread Andre Przywara
Hi, On 28/03/17 15:16, Dan Handley wrote: > Hi Kever > >> -Original Message- >> From: Kever Yang [mailto:kever.y...@rock-chips.com] >> Sent: 28 March 2017 08:23 >> >> Hi Andre, >> >> >> On 03/23/2017 05:22 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: >> > Hi Kever, >> > >> > I was wondering if we really

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spl: add support to booting with ATF

2017-03-28 Thread Kever Yang
Hi Andre, On 03/23/2017 05:22 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: Hi Kever, I was wondering if we really need to copy in all those ATF definitions. I think this is really an *interface* between the loader (SPL or BL2) and the runtime services (BL31), so it's supposed to be stable and we wouldn't need

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spl: add support to booting with ATF

2017-03-23 Thread Andre Przywara
Hi Kever, I was wondering if we really need to copy in all those ATF definitions. I think this is really an *interface* between the loader (SPL or BL2) and the runtime services (BL31), so it's supposed to be stable and we wouldn't need to pull in all those headers. So given that, can't we simply

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spl: add support to booting with ATF

2017-03-22 Thread Kever Yang
ATF(ARM Trusted Firmware) is used by ARM arch64 SoCs, find more infomation about ATF at: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware SPL is considered as BL2 in ATF terminology, it needs to load other parts of ATF binary like BL31, BL32, SCP-BL30, and BL33(U-Boot). And needs to prepare