Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE implies USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE

2017-07-26 Thread Dr. Philipp Tomsich
> On 17 Jul 2017, at 12:51, Łukasz Majewski wrote: > > Hi Marek, > >> On 07/17/2017 10:39 AM, Łukasz Majewski wrote: >>> On 07/14/2017 06:27 PM, Philipp Tomsich wrote: Up to now, there's been some ugliness associated with the dependency from CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE implies USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE

2017-07-17 Thread Łukasz Majewski
On 07/14/2017 06:27 PM, Philipp Tomsich wrote: Up to now, there's been some ugliness associated with the dependency from CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE to USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE: if someone only defined CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE, they'd meet a linker error due to missing symbols that came from

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE implies USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE

2017-07-17 Thread Łukasz Majewski
Hi Marek, On 07/17/2017 10:39 AM, Łukasz Majewski wrote: On 07/14/2017 06:27 PM, Philipp Tomsich wrote: Up to now, there's been some ugliness associated with the dependency from CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE to USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE: if someone only defined CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE, they'd meet a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE implies USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE

2017-07-17 Thread Marek Vasut
On 07/17/2017 10:39 AM, Łukasz Majewski wrote: > On 07/14/2017 06:27 PM, Philipp Tomsich wrote: >> Up to now, there's been some ugliness associated with the >> dependency from CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE to USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE: >> if someone only defined CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE, they'd meet a linker

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE implies USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE

2017-07-14 Thread Philipp Tomsich
Up to now, there's been some ugliness associated with the dependency from CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE to USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE: if someone only defined CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE, they'd meet a linker error due to missing symbols that came from USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE. Most platforms seem to have