> On 17 Jul 2017, at 12:51, Łukasz Majewski wrote:
>
> Hi Marek,
>
>> On 07/17/2017 10:39 AM, Łukasz Majewski wrote:
>>> On 07/14/2017 06:27 PM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
Up to now, there's been some ugliness associated with the
dependency from CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE to
On 07/14/2017 06:27 PM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
Up to now, there's been some ugliness associated with the
dependency from CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE to USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE:
if someone only defined CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE, they'd meet a linker
error due to missing symbols that came from
Hi Marek,
On 07/17/2017 10:39 AM, Łukasz Majewski wrote:
On 07/14/2017 06:27 PM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
Up to now, there's been some ugliness associated with the
dependency from CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE to USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE:
if someone only defined CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE, they'd meet a
On 07/17/2017 10:39 AM, Łukasz Majewski wrote:
> On 07/14/2017 06:27 PM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>> Up to now, there's been some ugliness associated with the
>> dependency from CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE to USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE:
>> if someone only defined CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE, they'd meet a linker
Up to now, there's been some ugliness associated with the
dependency from CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE to USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE:
if someone only defined CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE, they'd meet a linker
error due to missing symbols that came from USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE.
Most platforms seem to have
5 matches
Mail list logo