Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mx6ull: Handle the CONFIG_MX6ULL cases correctly

2018-01-08 Thread Stefano Babic
On 08/01/2018 12:35, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: >> On 03/01/2018 15:33, Fabio Estevam wrote: >>> Since commit 051ba9e082f7 ("Kconfig: mx6ull: Deselect MX6UL from >>> CONFIG_MX6ULL") CONFIG_MX6ULL does not select

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mx6ull: Handle the CONFIG_MX6ULL cases correctly

2018-01-08 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Stefano, On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 03/01/2018 15:33, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> Since commit 051ba9e082f7 ("Kconfig: mx6ull: Deselect MX6UL from >> CONFIG_MX6ULL") CONFIG_MX6ULL does not select CONFIG_MX6UL anymore, so >> take this into

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mx6ull: Handle the CONFIG_MX6ULL cases correctly

2018-01-04 Thread Stefano Babic
On 03/01/2018 15:33, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Since commit 051ba9e082f7 ("Kconfig: mx6ull: Deselect MX6UL from > CONFIG_MX6ULL") CONFIG_MX6ULL does not select CONFIG_MX6UL anymore, so > take this into consideration in all the checks for CONFIG_MX6UL. > > This fixes a boot regression. > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mx6ull: Handle the CONFIG_MX6ULL cases correctly

2018-01-04 Thread Jörg Krause
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 12:33 -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Since commit 051ba9e082f7 ("Kconfig: mx6ull: Deselect MX6UL from > CONFIG_MX6ULL") CONFIG_MX6ULL does not select CONFIG_MX6UL anymore, so > take this into consideration in all the checks for CONFIG_MX6UL. > > This fixes a boot regression.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mx6ull: Handle the CONFIG_MX6ULL cases correctly

2018-01-04 Thread Stefano Babic
On 03/01/2018 15:33, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Since commit 051ba9e082f7 ("Kconfig: mx6ull: Deselect MX6UL from > CONFIG_MX6ULL") CONFIG_MX6ULL does not select CONFIG_MX6UL anymore, so > take this into consideration in all the checks for CONFIG_MX6UL. > > This fixes a boot regression. > >

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mx6ull: Handle the CONFIG_MX6ULL cases correctly

2018-01-03 Thread Fabio Estevam
Since commit 051ba9e082f7 ("Kconfig: mx6ull: Deselect MX6UL from CONFIG_MX6ULL") CONFIG_MX6ULL does not select CONFIG_MX6UL anymore, so take this into consideration in all the checks for CONFIG_MX6UL. This fixes a boot regression. Reported-by: Stefan Agner Signed-off-by: Fabio