On 08/01/2018 12:35, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> On 03/01/2018 15:33, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> Since commit 051ba9e082f7 ("Kconfig: mx6ull: Deselect MX6UL from
>>> CONFIG_MX6ULL") CONFIG_MX6ULL does not select
Hi Stefano,
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 03/01/2018 15:33, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> Since commit 051ba9e082f7 ("Kconfig: mx6ull: Deselect MX6UL from
>> CONFIG_MX6ULL") CONFIG_MX6ULL does not select CONFIG_MX6UL anymore, so
>> take this into
On 03/01/2018 15:33, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Since commit 051ba9e082f7 ("Kconfig: mx6ull: Deselect MX6UL from
> CONFIG_MX6ULL") CONFIG_MX6ULL does not select CONFIG_MX6UL anymore, so
> take this into consideration in all the checks for CONFIG_MX6UL.
>
> This fixes a boot regression.
>
>
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 12:33 -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Since commit 051ba9e082f7 ("Kconfig: mx6ull: Deselect MX6UL from
> CONFIG_MX6ULL") CONFIG_MX6ULL does not select CONFIG_MX6UL anymore, so
> take this into consideration in all the checks for CONFIG_MX6UL.
>
> This fixes a boot regression.
On 03/01/2018 15:33, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Since commit 051ba9e082f7 ("Kconfig: mx6ull: Deselect MX6UL from
> CONFIG_MX6ULL") CONFIG_MX6ULL does not select CONFIG_MX6UL anymore, so
> take this into consideration in all the checks for CONFIG_MX6UL.
>
> This fixes a boot regression.
>
>
Since commit 051ba9e082f7 ("Kconfig: mx6ull: Deselect MX6UL from
CONFIG_MX6ULL") CONFIG_MX6ULL does not select CONFIG_MX6UL anymore, so
take this into consideration in all the checks for CONFIG_MX6UL.
This fixes a boot regression.
Reported-by: Stefan Agner
Signed-off-by: Fabio
6 matches
Mail list logo