Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
Hi Jagan, On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 March 2015 at 06:30, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 4 March 2015 at 09:02, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tom, On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Tom Rini tr...@konsulko.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:31:44PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: +Tom Hi Jagan, On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 January 2015 at 09:12, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 December 2014 at 13:32, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 19:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. I'm thinking about the other flashes too, since these params were taken from previous working and Linux mtd. You mean 'thinking about' or 'testing'? I should say previously they might not be 100% working as per datasheet some flash params currently are apparently wrong. Yes - about testing. Ping? What about your test results about this patch series? Some were pending - Will comment, pls- wait. thanks! -- I still don't see any additional comments. Looking at the history this patch series has been sitting there for months. Would you please let me know what you think about this series? Could you respond this? I wonder if this series could be merged in before MW is closed. I feel that you did not work on this. Can you please respond with any comments? Indeed. This looks like a fairly trivial sync-up, can you shoot me all of the patchwork links and I'll take a look? Thanks! -- Thanks for checking. Here you are: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419633/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419634/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419635/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419636/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419637/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419638/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419639/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419640/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419641/ They might not be applied cleanly now due to the significant delay since it was originally posted to the mailing list. So far Jagan pointed out only one issue and he said he would continue looking into the patches but I did
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
On 6 March 2015 at 06:30, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 4 March 2015 at 09:02, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tom, On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Tom Rini tr...@konsulko.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:31:44PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: +Tom Hi Jagan, On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 January 2015 at 09:12, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 December 2014 at 13:32, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 19:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. I'm thinking about the other flashes too, since these params were taken from previous working and Linux mtd. You mean 'thinking about' or 'testing'? I should say previously they might not be 100% working as per datasheet some flash params currently are apparently wrong. Yes - about testing. Ping? What about your test results about this patch series? Some were pending - Will comment, pls- wait. thanks! -- I still don't see any additional comments. Looking at the history this patch series has been sitting there for months. Would you please let me know what you think about this series? Could you respond this? I wonder if this series could be merged in before MW is closed. I feel that you did not work on this. Can you please respond with any comments? Indeed. This looks like a fairly trivial sync-up, can you shoot me all of the patchwork links and I'll take a look? Thanks! -- Thanks for checking. Here you are: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419633/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419634/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419635/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419636/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419637/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419638/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419639/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419640/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419641/ They might not be applied cleanly now due to the significant delay since it was originally posted to the mailing list. So far Jagan pointed out only one issue and he said he would continue looking into the patches but I did not receive any feedback for months. Sorry that I'm in long vacations which is less possible
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
On 4 March 2015 at 09:02, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tom, On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Tom Rini tr...@konsulko.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:31:44PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: +Tom Hi Jagan, On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 January 2015 at 09:12, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 December 2014 at 13:32, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 19:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. I'm thinking about the other flashes too, since these params were taken from previous working and Linux mtd. You mean 'thinking about' or 'testing'? I should say previously they might not be 100% working as per datasheet some flash params currently are apparently wrong. Yes - about testing. Ping? What about your test results about this patch series? Some were pending - Will comment, pls- wait. thanks! -- I still don't see any additional comments. Looking at the history this patch series has been sitting there for months. Would you please let me know what you think about this series? Could you respond this? I wonder if this series could be merged in before MW is closed. I feel that you did not work on this. Can you please respond with any comments? Indeed. This looks like a fairly trivial sync-up, can you shoot me all of the patchwork links and I'll take a look? Thanks! -- Thanks for checking. Here you are: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419633/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419634/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419635/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419636/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419637/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419638/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419639/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419640/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419641/ They might not be applied cleanly now due to the significant delay since it was originally posted to the mailing list. So far Jagan pointed out only one issue and he said he would continue looking into the patches but I did not receive any feedback for months. Sorry that I'm in long vacations which is less possible in mailing. As these changes are very crucial, I keep waiting the same. I will be back on March, end - if still need an urgent sync-up on these changes Tom or
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
Hi Jagan, On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 4 March 2015 at 09:02, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tom, On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Tom Rini tr...@konsulko.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:31:44PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: +Tom Hi Jagan, On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 January 2015 at 09:12, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 December 2014 at 13:32, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 19:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. I'm thinking about the other flashes too, since these params were taken from previous working and Linux mtd. You mean 'thinking about' or 'testing'? I should say previously they might not be 100% working as per datasheet some flash params currently are apparently wrong. Yes - about testing. Ping? What about your test results about this patch series? Some were pending - Will comment, pls- wait. thanks! -- I still don't see any additional comments. Looking at the history this patch series has been sitting there for months. Would you please let me know what you think about this series? Could you respond this? I wonder if this series could be merged in before MW is closed. I feel that you did not work on this. Can you please respond with any comments? Indeed. This looks like a fairly trivial sync-up, can you shoot me all of the patchwork links and I'll take a look? Thanks! -- Thanks for checking. Here you are: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419633/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419634/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419635/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419636/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419637/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419638/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419639/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419640/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419641/ They might not be applied cleanly now due to the significant delay since it was originally posted to the mailing list. So far Jagan pointed out only one issue and he said he would continue looking into the patches but I did not receive any feedback for months. Sorry that I'm in long vacations which is less possible in mailing. As these changes are very crucial, I keep waiting the
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
+Tom Hi Jagan, On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 January 2015 at 09:12, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 December 2014 at 13:32, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 19:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. I'm thinking about the other flashes too, since these params were taken from previous working and Linux mtd. You mean 'thinking about' or 'testing'? I should say previously they might not be 100% working as per datasheet some flash params currently are apparently wrong. Yes - about testing. Ping? What about your test results about this patch series? Some were pending - Will comment, pls- wait. thanks! -- I still don't see any additional comments. Looking at the history this patch series has been sitting there for months. Would you please let me know what you think about this series? Could you respond this? I wonder if this series could be merged in before MW is closed. I feel that you did not work on this. Can you please respond with any comments? Regards, Bin ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:31:44PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: +Tom Hi Jagan, On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 January 2015 at 09:12, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 December 2014 at 13:32, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 19:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. I'm thinking about the other flashes too, since these params were taken from previous working and Linux mtd. You mean 'thinking about' or 'testing'? I should say previously they might not be 100% working as per datasheet some flash params currently are apparently wrong. Yes - about testing. Ping? What about your test results about this patch series? Some were pending - Will comment, pls- wait. thanks! -- I still don't see any additional comments. Looking at the history this patch series has been sitting there for months. Would you please let me know what you think about this series? Could you respond this? I wonder if this series could be merged in before MW is closed. I feel that you did not work on this. Can you please respond with any comments? Indeed. This looks like a fairly trivial sync-up, can you shoot me all of the patchwork links and I'll take a look? Thanks! -- Tom signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
Hi Tom, On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Tom Rini tr...@konsulko.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:31:44PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: +Tom Hi Jagan, On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 January 2015 at 09:12, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 December 2014 at 13:32, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 19:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. I'm thinking about the other flashes too, since these params were taken from previous working and Linux mtd. You mean 'thinking about' or 'testing'? I should say previously they might not be 100% working as per datasheet some flash params currently are apparently wrong. Yes - about testing. Ping? What about your test results about this patch series? Some were pending - Will comment, pls- wait. thanks! -- I still don't see any additional comments. Looking at the history this patch series has been sitting there for months. Would you please let me know what you think about this series? Could you respond this? I wonder if this series could be merged in before MW is closed. I feel that you did not work on this. Can you please respond with any comments? Indeed. This looks like a fairly trivial sync-up, can you shoot me all of the patchwork links and I'll take a look? Thanks! -- Thanks for checking. Here you are: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419633/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419634/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419635/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419636/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419637/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419638/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419639/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419640/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419641/ They might not be applied cleanly now due to the significant delay since it was originally posted to the mailing list. So far Jagan pointed out only one issue and he said he would continue looking into the patches but I did not receive any feedback for months. Regards, Bin ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
Hi Jagan, On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 January 2015 at 09:12, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 December 2014 at 13:32, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 19:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. I'm thinking about the other flashes too, since these params were taken from previous working and Linux mtd. You mean 'thinking about' or 'testing'? I should say previously they might not be 100% working as per datasheet some flash params currently are apparently wrong. Yes - about testing. Ping? What about your test results about this patch series? Some were pending - Will comment, pls- wait. thanks! -- I still don't see any additional comments. Looking at the history this patch series has been sitting there for months. Would you please let me know what you think about this series? Could you respond this? I wonder if this series could be merged in before MW is closed. Regards, Bin ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
Hi Jagan, On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 January 2015 at 09:12, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 December 2014 at 13:32, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 19:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. I'm thinking about the other flashes too, since these params were taken from previous working and Linux mtd. You mean 'thinking about' or 'testing'? I should say previously they might not be 100% working as per datasheet some flash params currently are apparently wrong. Yes - about testing. Ping? What about your test results about this patch series? Some were pending - Will comment, pls- wait. thanks! -- I still don't see any additional comments. Looking at the history this patch series has been sitting there for months. Would you please let me know what you think about this series? Regards, Bin ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 December 2014 at 13:32, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 19:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. I'm thinking about the other flashes too, since these params were taken from previous working and Linux mtd. You mean 'thinking about' or 'testing'? I should say previously they might not be 100% working as per datasheet some flash params currently are apparently wrong. Yes - about testing. Ping? What about your test results about this patch series? Regards, Bin ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
On 12 January 2015 at 09:12, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 December 2014 at 13:32, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 19:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. I'm thinking about the other flashes too, since these params were taken from previous working and Linux mtd. You mean 'thinking about' or 'testing'? I should say previously they might not be 100% working as per datasheet some flash params currently are apparently wrong. Yes - about testing. Ping? What about your test results about this patch series? Some were pending - Will comment, pls- wait. thanks! -- Jagan. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
On 15 December 2014 at 19:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. I'm thinking about the other flashes too, since these params were taken from previous working and Linux mtd. thanks! -- Jagan. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 19:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. I'm thinking about the other flashes too, since these params were taken from previous working and Linux mtd. You mean 'thinking about' or 'testing'? I should say previously they might not be 100% working as per datasheet some flash params currently are apparently wrong. Regards, Bin ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
On 17 December 2014 at 13:32, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 19:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. I'm thinking about the other flashes too, since these params were taken from previous working and Linux mtd. You mean 'thinking about' or 'testing'? I should say previously they might not be 100% working as per datasheet some flash params currently are apparently wrong. Yes - about testing. thanks! -- Jagan. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Do you have any additional comments about this patch series besides the S25FL128S_64K and S25FL256S_64K sector size? If not, I can send the v4. Regards, Bin ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params drivers/mtd/spi/sf_internal.h | 5 ++ drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 185 ++ drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c| 4 + 3 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-) -- 1.8.2.1 ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? drivers/mtd/spi/sf_internal.h | 5 ++ drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 185 ++ drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c| 4 + 3 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-) -- 1.8.2.1 thanks! -- Jagan. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. drivers/mtd/spi/sf_internal.h | 5 ++ drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 185 ++ drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c| 4 + 3 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-) -- 1.8.2.1 thanks! -- Jagan. Regards, Bin ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? drivers/mtd/spi/sf_internal.h | 5 ++ drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 185 ++ drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c| 4 + 3 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-) thanks! -- Jagan. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] sf: Update flash params for supported read commands and sector size
Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 11 December 2014 at 08:34, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jagan, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bin, On 10 December 2014 at 18:21, Bin Meng bmeng...@gmail.com wrote: This series update SPI flash supported read commands per datasheet in the flash params table, and change flash sector size to 4KiB as long as flash supports sector erase (20h) command, to ensure 'sf erase offset +len' work on 4KiB boundary instead of 64KiB when given SECT_4K. Changes in v3: - Rebase with Jagan's patch series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419154/ Bin Meng (9): sf: Update SST flash params sf: Update Atmel flash params sf: Update EON flash params sf: Update GigaDevice flash params sf: Update Macronix flash params sf: Update Spansion flash params sf: Update Micron flash params sf: Update Winbond flash params sf: Give proper spacing between flash table params Thanks for the updates - have you verified these changes? I verified some, but not all of these flash parts. The update is based on flash datasheet, so if something is broken, eg before this series the flash advertises only READ_NORM and after my series it is changed to READ_FULL, and let's say QUAD_IO_FAST is not working, it is very likely that the SPI controller driver has some bugs when supporting QUAD_IO_FAST. Since these updates were tested before, I will skip these for this PR. Will test all the rest (except these) and send the PR soon. Let me know your inputs? I am fine, as long as this PR will not contains other commits which modify the same sf_params.c to introduce more flash support. We can test these updates and if everything looks fine, apply these first and ask other commits to rebase on this series to introduce more flash support. Regards, Bin ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
