On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 09:47 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Have you looked at extending the SPL buildsys bits, which in essence do
2 builds, to do 3 builds for sunxi, so that we simply always build
both SPL flavors?
I hadn't thought of it. Is it only the SPL binary which differs between
FEL and
Hi,
On 07/09/2014 10:00 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 09:47 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Have you looked at extending the SPL buildsys bits, which in essence do
2 builds, to do 3 builds for sunxi, so that we simply always build
both SPL flavors?
I hadn't thought of it. Is it
ons 2014-07-09 klockan 09:00 +0100 skrev Ian Campbell:
I hadn't thought of it. Is it only the SPL binary which differs between
FEL and non-FEL then?
There is also a small difference in the default environment to enable
boot-from-RAM in the FEL version of main u-boot. This is not enabled in
the
Hi,
On 07/09/2014 03:03 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
ons 2014-07-09 klockan 09:00 +0100 skrev Ian Campbell:
I hadn't thought of it. Is it only the SPL binary which differs between
FEL and non-FEL then?
There is also a small difference in the default environment to enable
boot-from-RAM in
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:45 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:23:13PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 12:47 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
That's not how we like things to look however when we can help it. Just
toss a __maybe_unused in front of the declaration
Hi,
On 07/07/2014 05:13 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 14:53 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 07/06/2014 09:26 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 11:36 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
adds sun4i and sun5i support
Does this series omit FEL mode support or did you
Hi,
On 07/07/2014 10:23 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 12:47 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
That's not how we like things to look however when we can help it. Just
toss a __maybe_unused in front of the declaration (and make sure we have
linux/compiler.h included.
OK. How about the
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 08:23:11AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:45 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:23:13PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 12:47 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
That's not how we like things to look however when we can help
Hi Ian,
On 07/06/2014 09:12 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 11:36 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Here is v2 of my patch series to be applied on top of Ian's recently merged
basic sun7i support.
For the A13-OLinuXinoM and r7-tv-dongle with this series I'm seeing:
Hi,
On 07/06/2014 09:26 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 11:36 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
adds sun4i and sun5i support
Does this series omit FEL mode support or did you just not include it
for the new boards?
I just did not include it.
I think in general we want a _FEL
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:53:44PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 07/06/2014 09:26 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 11:36 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
adds sun4i and sun5i support
Does this series omit FEL mode support or did you just not include it
for the new
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 14:50 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
AFAIK we will never define both EMAC and GMAC for the same board,
If we are sure of this (and I suspect this is the case, since IIRC they
share some pins) then I agree with your suggestion.
so IMHO a better fix would be to change this
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 14:53 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 07/06/2014 09:26 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 11:36 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
adds sun4i and sun5i support
Does this series omit FEL mode support or did you just not include it
for the new boards?
I
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:10:42PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 14:50 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
AFAIK we will never define both EMAC and GMAC for the same board,
If we are sure of this (and I suspect this is the case, since IIRC they
share some pins) then I agree with
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 12:47 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
That's not how we like things to look however when we can help it. Just
toss a __maybe_unused in front of the declaration (and make sure we have
linux/compiler.h included.
OK. How about the following?
Hans, BTW, I spotted this issue with:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:23:13PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 12:47 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
That's not how we like things to look however when we can help it. Just
toss a __maybe_unused in front of the declaration (and make sure we have
linux/compiler.h included.
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 11:36 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Here is v2 of my patch series to be applied on top of Ian's recently merged
basic sun7i support.
For the A13-OLinuXinoM and r7-tv-dongle with this series I'm seeing:
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/board.c: In function ‘cpu_eth_init’:
Hi Ian,
Slightly off-topic, but... When you provide some code excerpt, you
should make sure it doesn't look like a git patch, because if it does,
then our Patchwork, which reads the list, will think it is actually a
patch submission:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/367391/
Amicalement,
On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 21:18 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Ian,
Slightly off-topic, but... When you provide some code excerpt, you
should make sure it doesn't look like a git patch, because if it does,
then our Patchwork, which reads the list, will think it is actually a
patch submission:
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 11:36 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
adds sun4i and sun5i support
Does this series omit FEL mode support or did you just not include it
for the new boards?
I think in general we want a _FEL variant for every board except the
minority which don't have an OTG port etc.
Ian.
Hi Ian,
On Sun, 06 Jul 2014 20:22:31 +0100, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
wrote:
On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 21:18 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Ian,
Slightly off-topic, but... When you provide some code excerpt, you
should make sure it doesn't look like a git patch, because if it does,
On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 22:54 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Ian,
On Sun, 06 Jul 2014 20:22:31 +0100, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
wrote:
On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 21:18 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Ian,
Slightly off-topic, but... When you provide some code excerpt, you
Dear Ian Campbell,
In message 1404682080.11284.33.ca...@dagon.hellion.org.uk you wrote:
Oh, I didn't mean to suggest skipping all that good stuff, just that the
patch is already in a local branch ready to go when it is acked so I
don't need to fetch it from patchwork.
It is a very good
On 26.06.2014 09:38, Ian Campbell wrote:
(re-adding Hans whose CC I seem to have dropped somehow, sorry)
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:57 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Hi Albert,
Any comments on these sunxi series from Hans and myself?
I wonder if Hans and I should be applying for a
(re-adding Hans whose CC I seem to have dropped somehow, sorry)
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:57 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Hi Albert,
Any comments on these sunxi series from Hans and myself?
I wonder if Hans and I should be applying for a u-boot-sunxi.git
custodian tree[0]?
Ian.
[0]
Hi Albert,
Any comments on these sunxi series from Hans and myself?
Thanks,
Ian.
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 11:36 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
Here is v2 of my patch series to be applied on top of Ian's recently merged
basic sun7i support.
This patch series begins with a few bug fixes
Hi All,
Here is v2 of my patch series to be applied on top of Ian's recently merged
basic sun7i support.
This patch series begins with a few bug fixes found while working on preparing
the rest of the series, adds sun4i and sun5i support and rounds things of with
some networking fixes /
27 matches
Mail list logo
