Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] cmd_fdt: Print the control fdt in terms of virtual memory

2015-02-05 Thread Simon Glass
On 5 February 2015 at 22:11, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: On 4 February 2015 at 20:56, Joe Hershberger joe.hershber...@ni.com wrote: If you want to inspect the control device tree using the fdt command, the fdt address -c command previously unhelpfully printed the phys memory address

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] cmd_fdt: Print the control fdt in terms of virtual memory

2015-02-05 Thread Simon Glass
On 4 February 2015 at 20:56, Joe Hershberger joe.hershber...@ni.com wrote: If you want to inspect the control device tree using the fdt command, the fdt address -c command previously unhelpfully printed the phys memory address of the device tree. That address could not then be used to set the

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] cmd_fdt: Print the control fdt in terms of virtual memory

2015-02-04 Thread Joe Hershberger
If you want to inspect the control device tree using the fdt command, the fdt address -c command previously unhelpfully printed the phys memory address of the device tree. That address could not then be used to set the fdt address for inspection. Changed the resulting print to one that can be