On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 02:28:13 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
On 14-08-06 05:13 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 01:48:06 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
On 14-07-30 06:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 10:13:22 PM, Steve Rae wrote:
[...]
+
Hi Marek,
[snip]
I don't want to be the first to defined it for all of armv7
Honestly, we should just enable this CONFIG_SYS_VSNPRINTF by default for the
good of humanity and all the things, since this unbounded string handling is
just evil (see how OpenSSL ended up, partly because
On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 03:28:14 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Marek,
[snip]
I don't want to be the first to defined it for all of armv7
Honestly, we should just enable this CONFIG_SYS_VSNPRINTF by default for
the good of humanity and all the things, since this
On 14-08-07 06:23 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 02:28:13 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
On 14-08-06 05:13 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 01:48:06 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
On 14-07-30 06:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 10:13:22 PM,
On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 06:52:44 PM, Steve Rae wrote:
[...]
I was referring to what you mention below...
852 - Safe printf() functions
853 Define CONFIG_SYS_VSNPRINTF to compile in safe versions of
854 the printf() functions. These are defined in
855
On 14-07-30 06:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 10:13:22 PM, Steve Rae wrote:
[...]
+
+#include common.h
+#include fb_mmc.h
+#include part.h
+#include sparse_format.h
+
+/* The 64 defined bytes plus \0 */
+#define RESPONSE_LEN (64 + 1)
+
+static char *response_str;
On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 01:48:06 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
On 14-07-30 06:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 10:13:22 PM, Steve Rae wrote:
[...]
+
+#include common.h
+#include fb_mmc.h
+#include part.h
+#include sparse_format.h
+
+/* The 64 defined
On 14-08-06 05:13 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 01:48:06 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
On 14-07-30 06:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 10:13:22 PM, Steve Rae wrote:
[...]
+
+#include common.h
+#include fb_mmc.h
+#include part.h
+#include
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 10:13:22 PM, Steve Rae wrote:
[...]
+
+#include common.h
+#include fb_mmc.h
+#include part.h
+#include sparse_format.h
+
+/* The 64 defined bytes plus \0 */
+#define RESPONSE_LEN (64 + 1)
+
+static char *response_str;
I'd suggest to pass this response_str
- add support for 'fastboot flash' command for eMMC devices
Signed-off-by: Steve Rae s...@broadcom.com
---
I suspect that the sparse image handling (ie. the while (remaining_chunks)
loop)
has been implemented elsewhere -- I need help finding the original code to
determine
any licensing
10 matches
Mail list logo
