On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:45:44 +0530
Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
Hi,
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 12:43:36AM +, André Przywara wrote:
> > On 14/01/2019 12:41, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > CMU block on most of the actions SoC seems to be
> > > identical(at-least, S900 and
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 12:43:36AM +, André Przywara wrote:
> On 14/01/2019 12:41, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > CMU block on most of the actions SoC seems to be identical(at-least, S900
> > and S700).
>
> Actually they are not. Not even for the small subset that we implement
On 14/01/2019 12:41, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
Hi,
> CMU block on most of the actions SoC seems to be identical(at-least, S900 and
> S700).
Actually they are not. Not even for the small subset that we implement
here. Try "diff -wu arch/arm/include/asm/arch-owl/regs_s*.h" for a
start, plus the
CMU block on most of the actions SoC seems to be identical(at-least, S900 and
S700).
This patch converts S900 clock driver to something common that can
be used for other SoCs, for instance S700(most of clk registres are same).
Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar
---
Changes since v1:
*
4 matches
Mail list logo