Le 12/01/2011 17:49, Alexander Holler a écrit :
Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
Tested-by: Thomas Weber we...@corscience.de
Acked-by: Alexander Hollerhol...@ahsoftware.de
Am 09.01.2011 23:19, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
From: Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de
gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
avoid that as done in the kernel.
Reading C99 6.7.3 8 and the comment 114) there, I think it is a bug of that
gcc version to ignore the
Am 09.01.2011 23:19, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
avoid that as done in the kernel.
Have had a look at the asm generated by gcc 4.5.1, looks good.
The wrong optimization in arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/clock.c is gone and
the writeb in
Dear Alexander Holler,
In message 4d2dcb18.20...@ahsoftware.de you wrote:
Am 09.01.2011 23:19, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
avoid that as done in the kernel.
Have had a look at the asm generated by gcc 4.5.1, looks good.
The
Am 12.01.2011 17:40, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Alexander Holler,
In message4d2dcb18.20...@ahsoftware.de you wrote:
Am 09.01.2011 23:19, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
avoid that as done in the kernel.
Have had a look at the asm
From: Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de
gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
avoid that as done in the kernel.
Reading C99 6.7.3 8 and the comment 114) there, I think it is a bug of that
gcc version to ignore the volatile type qualifier used e.g. in __arch_getl().
6 matches
Mail list logo
