On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 4:18 PM Bin Meng wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 4:51 AM Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 10:45 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 6:34 PM Bin Meng wrote:
> > > > + .flags = DM_FLAG_PRE_RELOC,
> > >
> > > This
Hi Andy,
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 4:51 AM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 10:45 PM Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 6:34 PM Bin Meng wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:00 PM Stefan Roese wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/cpu.c
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 10:45 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 6:34 PM Bin Meng wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:00 PM Stefan Roese wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/cpu.c b/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/cpu.c
> > index 56e9813..2eb9172 100644
> > ---
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 6:34 PM Bin Meng wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:00 PM Stefan Roese wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/cpu.c b/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/cpu.c
> index 56e9813..2eb9172 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/cpu.c
> @@ -203,4
Hi Bin,
On 12.10.2018 17:34, Bin Meng wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:00 PM Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi!
I just tested the latest U-Boot version on one of my x86
platforms (Baytrail theadorable-x86-dfi-bt700_defconfig).
Unfortunately this patch break the board port, resulting in
this output:
Hi Stefan,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:00 PM Stefan Roese wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I just tested the latest U-Boot version on one of my x86
> platforms (Baytrail theadorable-x86-dfi-bt700_defconfig).
> Unfortunately this patch break the board port, resulting in
> this output:
>
> U-Boot
Hi!
I just tested the latest U-Boot version on one of my x86
platforms (Baytrail theadorable-x86-dfi-bt700_defconfig).
Unfortunately this patch break the board port, resulting in
this output:
U-Boot 2018.11-rc1-00268-g1f7888b626 (Oct 12 2018 - 15:23:52 +0200)
initcall sequence fff5aa40 failed
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:30 PM Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Mario,
>
> On 6 August 2018 at 02:23, Mario Six wrote:
> > When the DM CPU drivers are active, printing information about a CPU
> > should be delegated to a matching driver.
> >
> > Hence, add a static print_cpuinfo that
Hi Mario,
On 6 August 2018 at 02:23, Mario Six wrote:
> When the DM CPU drivers are active, printing information about a CPU
> should be delegated to a matching driver.
>
> Hence, add a static print_cpuinfo that implements this delegation when
> DM CPU drivers are active.
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon
When the DM CPU drivers are active, printing information about a CPU
should be delegated to a matching driver.
Hence, add a static print_cpuinfo that implements this delegation when
DM CPU drivers are active.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
Signed-off-by: Mario Six
---
Notes:
v3 -> v4:
*
10 matches
Mail list logo