On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 03:06:47PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Now that named GPIO banks are supported, along with a way of obtaining
the status of a GPIO (input or output), we can provide an enhanced
GPIO command for driver model. Where the driver provides its own operation
for obtaining the
Hi Tom,
On 26 February 2014 09:34, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 03:06:47PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Now that named GPIO banks are supported, along with a way of obtaining
the status of a GPIO (input or output), we can provide an enhanced
GPIO command for driver
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:21:15AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 26 February 2014 09:34, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 03:06:47PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Now that named GPIO banks are supported, along with a way of obtaining
the status of a GPIO
Hi Tom,
On 26 February 2014 10:28, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:21:15AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 26 February 2014 09:34, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 03:06:47PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Now that named GPIO banks
Now that named GPIO banks are supported, along with a way of obtaining
the status of a GPIO (input or output), we can provide an enhanced
GPIO command for driver model. Where the driver provides its own operation
for obtaining the GPIO state, this is used, otherwise a generic version
is
5 matches
Mail list logo