On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 03:34, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 06:48, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
> >
> > In the Linux pinctrl binding, the pin configuration nodes don't need to
> > be direct children of the pin controller device (may be grandchildren for
> > example). This behavior is
On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 06:48, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
>
> In the Linux pinctrl binding, the pin configuration nodes don't need to
> be direct children of the pin controller device (may be grandchildren for
> example). This behavior is managed with the pinconfig u-class which
> recursively bind all
In the Linux pinctrl binding, the pin configuration nodes don't need to
be direct children of the pin controller device (may be grandchildren for
example). This behavior is managed with the pinconfig u-class which
recursively bind all the sub-node of the pin controller.
But for some binding (when
3 matches
Mail list logo
