Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] SPL -> U-Boot Chain of Trust

2016-05-02 Thread Andreas Dannenberg
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 01:45:35PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > On 27 April 2016 at 09:14, Andreas Dannenberg wrote: > > Yeah please let me/us know if there is something you have that could be > > recycled. > > I just sent a patch referring to this. I didn't find anything

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] SPL -> U-Boot Chain of Trust

2016-05-01 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On 27 April 2016 at 09:14, Andreas Dannenberg wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 08:34:50AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Andreas, >> >> On 14 April 2016 at 17:07, Andreas Dannenberg wrote: >> > >> > Hi Simon, thanks for the feedback. Additional

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] SPL -> U-Boot Chain of Trust

2016-04-27 Thread Andreas Dannenberg
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 08:34:50AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On 14 April 2016 at 17:07, Andreas Dannenberg wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, thanks for the feedback. Additional comments inlined... > > > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 06:04:15PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: >

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] SPL -> U-Boot Chain of Trust

2016-04-27 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Andreas, On 14 April 2016 at 17:07, Andreas Dannenberg wrote: > > Hi Simon, thanks for the feedback. Additional comments inlined... > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 06:04:15PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > > > On 28 March 2016 at 14:19, Andreas Dannenberg

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] SPL -> U-Boot Chain of Trust

2016-04-14 Thread Andreas Dannenberg
Hi Simon, thanks for the feedback. Additional comments inlined... On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 06:04:15PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On 28 March 2016 at 14:19, Andreas Dannenberg wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 03:32:40PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > >> I'm

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] SPL -> U-Boot Chain of Trust

2016-04-04 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Andreas, On 28 March 2016 at 14:19, Andreas Dannenberg wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 03:32:40PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: >> I'm interested in getting secure device support going, but it seems >> like we should need more than that, ie something to keep the chain of >> trust

[U-Boot] [RFC] SPL -> U-Boot Chain of Trust

2016-03-28 Thread Andreas Dannenberg
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 03:32:40PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > I'm interested in getting secure device support going, but it seems > like we should need more than that, ie something to keep the chain of > trust going. Tom et al., I just saw your reply to Vitaly's email and I'm actually just looking