Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARM: print gcc version

2011-01-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Alexander Holler, In message <4d35c836.3020...@ahsoftware.de> you wrote: > > > @@ -416,6 +416,8 @@ $(U_BOOT_ONENAND): $(ONENAND_IPL) $(obj)u-boot.bin > > $(VERSION_FILE): > > @( printf '#define U_BOOT_VERSION "U-Boot %s%s"\n' > > "$(U_BOOT_VERSION)" \ > >

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARM: print gcc version

2011-01-18 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 18.01.2011 17:20, schrieb Peter Tyser: Anyway, I would found it a nice feature, at startup or when running the version command, but both aren't a must. >>> >>> I think it would be a really useful extension to the version command. >>> Looking forwad to seeing your patch. >> >> Maybe if

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARM: print gcc version

2011-01-18 Thread Peter Tyser
> >> Anyway, I would found it a nice feature, at startup or when running the > >> version command, but both aren't a must. > > > > I think it would be a really useful extension to the version command. > > Looking forwad to seeing your patch. > > Maybe if someone could feed me with what to use for

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARM: print gcc version

2011-01-18 Thread Alexander Holler
Hello, Am 17.01.2011 23:28, schrieb Wolfgang Denk: >> Anyway, I would found it a nice feature, at startup or when running the >> version command, but both aren't a must. > > I think it would be a really useful extension to the version command. > Looking forwad to seeing your patch. Maybe if some

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARM: print gcc version

2011-01-17 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Alexander Holler, In message <4d2bb9ac.1040...@ahsoftware.de> you wrote: > > > On the other hand, that would require changes to many files, and the > > gcc __VERSION__ string is pretty long on some systems, which may cause > > additional problems. > > Hmm, here it includes only "4.5.2", the

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARM: print gcc version

2011-01-10 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 09.01.2011 22:03, schrieb Wolfgang Denk: > Dear Alexander Holler, > > In message<1292863117-3175-1-git-send-email-hol...@ahsoftware.de> you wrote: >> It might be useful to see what compiler version was used to compile u-boot. >> --- >> arch/arm/lib/board.c |2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 in

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARM: print gcc version

2011-01-09 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Alexander Holler, In message <1292863117-3175-1-git-send-email-hol...@ahsoftware.de> you wrote: > It might be useful to see what compiler version was used to compile u-boot. > --- > arch/arm/lib/board.c |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARM: print gcc version

2010-12-20 Thread Alexander Holler
It might be useful to see what compiler version was used to compile u-boot. --- arch/arm/lib/board.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/board.c b/arch/arm/lib/board.c index 96c0e30..df90b5e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c +++ b/arch/arm/lib/boa