On 10 February 2015 at 02:55, Michal Simek wrote:
>
> On 02/09/2015 11:14 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi MIchal,
> >
> > On 9 February 2015 at 03:27, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> Hi Simon,
> >>
> >> On 02/06/2015 06:45 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>>
> >>> With a heavy heart:
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Simon
On 02/09/2015 11:14 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi MIchal,
>
> On 9 February 2015 at 03:27, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 02/06/2015 06:45 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> On 4 February 2015 at 23:31, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
On 02/05/2015 04:07 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi M
Hi MIchal,
On 9 February 2015 at 03:27, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 02/06/2015 06:45 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> On 4 February 2015 at 23:31, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 02/05/2015 04:07 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Michal,
On 3 February 2015 at 17:40, Simon Glass
Hi Simon,
On 02/06/2015 06:45 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> On 4 February 2015 at 23:31, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 02/05/2015 04:07 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Michal,
>>>
>>> On 3 February 2015 at 17:40, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Michal,
On 3 February 2015 at 02:11, Michal Sim
On 4 February 2015 at 23:31, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/05/2015 04:07 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> On 3 February 2015 at 17:40, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Michal,
>>>
>>> On 3 February 2015 at 02:11, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 02/03/2015 03:02 AM, Masah
Hi,
On 02/05/2015 04:07 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 3 February 2015 at 17:40, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> On 3 February 2015 at 02:11, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On 02/03/2015 03:02 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Hi.
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16
Hi Michal,
On 3 February 2015 at 17:40, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 3 February 2015 at 02:11, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 02/03/2015 03:02 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:57:15 -0700
>>> Simon Glass wrote:
>>>
Hi Michal,
>>
Hi Albert,
If we use SPL, we do not have to relocate code, I think.
SPL doesn't have relocation that's why this code is not used there.
It is not what I meant.
If SPL can directly load the main u-boot image
to the DRAM address where it is linked,
we do not relocate the code in the main
Hi Albert,
On 02/04/2015 11:34 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hello Michal,
>
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:56:02 +0100, Michal Simek
> wrote:
>> On 02/04/2015 04:11 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>> Hi Michal,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:11:39 +0100
>>> Michal Simek wrote:
>>>
Hi Simon,
>>
Hello Michal,
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:56:02 +0100, Michal Simek
wrote:
> On 02/04/2015 04:11 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:11:39 +0100
> > Michal Simek wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Simon,
> >>
> >> On 02/03/2015 03:02 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >>> Hi.
> >>
Hi,
On 02/04/2015 06:48 AM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
>> Maybe I asked this before, but when can we remove
>> CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC? What platforms need it?
>
> A quick grep yields a global define of CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC for avr32,
> m68k, nds32, and sparc
+ Microblaze to move
On 02/04/2015 04:11 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:11:39 +0100
> Michal Simek wrote:
>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 02/03/2015 03:02 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:57:15 -0700
>>> Simon Glass wrote:
>>>
Hi Michal,
>>
Hi Simon,
Maybe I asked this before, but when can we remove
CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC? What platforms need it?
A quick grep yields a global define of CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC for
avr32, m68k, nds32, and sparc
Next question is - which of these platforms have toolchains which lack
the abili
Hi Michal,
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:11:39 +0100
Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 02/03/2015 03:02 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:57:15 -0700
> > Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Michal,
> >>
> >> On 2 February 2015 at 08:31, Michal Simek wrote:
> >>>
Hi Michal,
On 3 February 2015 at 02:11, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 02/03/2015 03:02 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:57:15 -0700
>> Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Michal,
>>>
>>> On 2 February 2015 at 08:31, Michal Simek wrote:
Targets with CONFIG_
Hi Simon,
On 02/03/2015 03:02 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:57:15 -0700
> Simon Glass wrote:
>
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> On 2 February 2015 at 08:31, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> Targets with CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC do not use REL/RELA
>>> relocation (mostly only GOT) wh
Hi.
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:57:15 -0700
Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 2 February 2015 at 08:31, Michal Simek wrote:
> > Targets with CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC do not use REL/RELA
> > relocation (mostly only GOT) where functions aray are not
> > updated. This patch is fixing function po
Hi Michal,
On 2 February 2015 at 08:31, Michal Simek wrote:
> Targets with CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC do not use REL/RELA
> relocation (mostly only GOT) where functions aray are not
> updated. This patch is fixing function pointers for DM core
> and serial-uclass to ensure that relocated functions
Targets with CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC do not use REL/RELA
relocation (mostly only GOT) where functions aray are not
updated. This patch is fixing function pointers for DM core
and serial-uclass to ensure that relocated functions are called.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
drivers/core/root.c
19 matches
Mail list logo
