Dear Marek, Wolfgang,
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
I hate to say it ... but given that this will cause duplication of code,
I'm
somehow inclined to push you to do a complete replacement of the old
musb code,
remove it and add this.
Agreed, we
Marek, Wolfgang,
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Ilya Yanok
ilya.ya...@cogentembedded.comwrote:
Dear Marek, Wolfgang,
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
I hate to say it ... but given that this will cause duplication of
code, I'm
somehow inclined to
Argh, sorry. could = could not.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Dear Ilya Yanok,
Current MUSB driver in U-Boot uses old UDC API while new gagdet
client drivers need new gadget API. Also current MUSB driver has
some significant limitations (like inability to handle tx for
endpoints other than ep0). So I think port of new Linux driver is
desirable.
This
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 201208092115.16264.marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
I hate to say it ... but given that this will cause duplication of code, I'm
somehow inclined to push you to do a complete replacement of the old musb
code,
remove it and add this.
Agreed, we should avoid
Current MUSB driver in U-Boot uses old UDC API while new gagdet
client drivers need new gadget API. Also current MUSB driver has
some significant limitations (like inability to handle tx for
endpoints other than ep0). So I think port of new Linux driver is
desirable.
This is initial port,
6 matches
Mail list logo