Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Port of MUSB driver from Linux

2012-09-22 Thread Ilya Yanok
Dear Marek, On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: [...] I'm glad about this. But how can we make this work if we already have a driver for this in u-boot, now we will have another. Tom ? What's so wrong in letting the two coexist for some time so people could

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Port of MUSB driver from Linux

2012-09-22 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/21/12 17:55, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Ilya Yanok, Current MUSB driver in U-Boot uses old UDC API while new gagdet client drivers need new gadget API. Also current MUSB driver has some significant limitations (like inability to handle tx

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Port of MUSB driver from Linux

2012-09-21 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Ilya Yanok, Current MUSB driver in U-Boot uses old UDC API while new gagdet client drivers need new gadget API. Also current MUSB driver has some significant limitations (like inability to handle tx for endpoints other than ep0). So I think port of new Linux driver is desirable. This

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Port of MUSB driver from Linux

2012-09-16 Thread Ilya Yanok
Current MUSB driver in U-Boot uses old UDC API while new gagdet client drivers need new gadget API. Also current MUSB driver has some significant limitations (like inability to handle tx for endpoints other than ep0). So I think port of new Linux driver is desirable. This is initial port,