On 08/05/2014 07:16, Tim Harvey wrote:
We only need to read in the size of struct image_header and thus don't
need to know the page size of the nand device.
Cc: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey thar...@gateworks.com
Acked-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
Hi.
On Wed, 7 May 2014 22:16:12 -0700
Tim Harvey thar...@gateworks.com wrote:
We only need to read in the size of struct image_header and thus don't
need to know the page size of the nand device.
Cc: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey thar...@gateworks.com
Hi Masahiro,
On 14/05/2014 10:52, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 7 May 2014 22:16:12 -0700
Tim Harvey thar...@gateworks.com wrote:
We only need to read in the size of struct image_header and thus don't
need to know the page size of the nand device.
Cc: Scott Wood
We only need to read in the size of struct image_header and thus don't
need to know the page size of the nand device.
Cc: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey thar...@gateworks.com
Acked-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
Acked-by: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
---
v3:
4 matches
Mail list logo