Re: [U-Boot] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2

2014-11-28 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2014-11-10 14:36, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 10/11/14 13:25, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2014-11-10 14:08, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 10/11/14 12:51, Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Marc, what is the motivation to expose a PSCI 0.1 interface in U-boot, instead of 0.2? Support for preexisting users of 0.1? The

Re: [U-Boot] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2

2014-11-28 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 28/11/14 08:52, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2014-11-10 14:36, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 10/11/14 13:25, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2014-11-10 14:08, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 10/11/14 12:51, Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Marc, what is the motivation to expose a PSCI 0.1 interface in U-boot, instead of 0.2? Support

Re: [U-Boot] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2

2014-11-28 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2014-11-28 11:05, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 28/11/14 08:52, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2014-11-10 14:36, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 10/11/14 13:25, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2014-11-10 14:08, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 10/11/14 12:51, Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Marc, what is the motivation to expose a PSCI 0.1

Re: [U-Boot] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2

2014-11-10 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 10/11/14 12:51, Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Marc, what is the motivation to expose a PSCI 0.1 interface in U-boot, instead of 0.2? Support for preexisting users of 0.1? The kernel seems to be happy with both, and I'm now wondering if we should actually add the legacy version to Jailhouse as

[U-Boot] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2

2014-11-10 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Marc, what is the motivation to expose a PSCI 0.1 interface in U-boot, instead of 0.2? Support for preexisting users of 0.1? The kernel seems to be happy with both, and I'm now wondering if we should actually add the legacy version to Jailhouse as well (I hope we can avoid this). Still

Re: [U-Boot] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2

2014-11-10 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2014-11-10 14:08, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 10/11/14 12:51, Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Marc, what is the motivation to expose a PSCI 0.1 interface in U-boot, instead of 0.2? Support for preexisting users of 0.1? The kernel seems to be happy with both, and I'm now wondering if we should actually

Re: [U-Boot] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2

2014-11-10 Thread Jan Kiszka
] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2 On 2014-11-10 14:08, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 10/11/14 12:51, Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Marc, what is the motivation to expose a PSCI 0.1 interface in U-boot, instead of 0.2? Support for preexisting users of 0.1? The kernel seems to be happy with both, and I'm now wondering

Re: [U-Boot] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2

2014-11-10 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 10/11/14 13:25, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2014-11-10 14:08, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 10/11/14 12:51, Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Marc, what is the motivation to expose a PSCI 0.1 interface in U-boot, instead of 0.2? Support for preexisting users of 0.1? The kernel seems to be happy with both, and I'm

Re: [U-Boot] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2

2014-11-10 Thread bhupesh.sha...@freescale.com
Hi, -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Jan Kiszka Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 6:56 PM To: Marc Zyngier Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2 On 2014-11-10 14:08, Marc Zyngier