Re: [U-Boot] Albert/Tom -- could we get patch applied or some feedback (was Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] socfpga: Adding configuration for development kit)

2013-09-05 Thread Chin Liang See
Hi Pavel, On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 13:10 +0200, ZY - pavel wrote: > Hi! > > > Wonder any updates on this? We plan to send the new patches only once > > these existing patches are accepted. Appreciate for your helps > > again. > > Albert seems to be back, perhaps he'll us how he wants us to proceed

Re: [U-Boot] Albert/Tom -- could we get patch applied or some feedback (was Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] socfpga: Adding configuration for development kit)

2013-09-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Wonder any updates on this? We plan to send the new patches only once > these existing patches are accepted. Appreciate for your helps > again. Albert seems to be back, perhaps he'll us how he wants us to proceed? Thanks,

Re: [U-Boot] Albert/Tom -- could we get patch applied or some feedback (was Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] socfpga: Adding configuration for development kit)

2013-08-27 Thread Chin Liang See
Hi guys, Wonder any updates on this? We plan to send the new patches only once these existing patches are accepted. Appreciate for your helps again. Chin Liang On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 13:05 +0200, ZY - pavel wrote: > Hi! > > > Albert, Tom this patch has been here for a week, without any > >

Re: [U-Boot] Albert/Tom -- could we get patch applied or some feedback (was Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] socfpga: Adding configuration for development kit)

2013-08-22 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:05:42PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Albert, Tom this patch has been here for a week, without any > > comments. As far as I can tell, it is pretty much perfect. Can we get > > any comments on it, or (better), get it applied? > > Another week passed, and n

[U-Boot] Albert/Tom -- could we get patch applied or some feedback (was Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] socfpga: Adding configuration for development kit)

2013-08-22 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Albert, Tom this patch has been here for a week, without any > comments. As far as I can tell, it is pretty much perfect. Can we get > any comments on it, or (better), get it applied? Another week passed, and nothing happens. Is there just slow holiday time, or are we doing something wr