Hi York,
On 30 September 2014 22:06, York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote:
Simon,
I didn't notice until today the commit
294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke at least T4240QDS. I have
narrowed down to these two lines in common/board_r.c
initr_barrier,
initr_malloc,
If
On 10/01/2014 08:11 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi York,
On 30 September 2014 22:06, York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote:
Simon,
I didn't notice until today the commit
294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke at least T4240QDS. I have
narrowed down to these two lines in
Hi York,
On 1 October 2014 10:27, York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote:
On 10/01/2014 08:11 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi York,
On 30 September 2014 22:06, York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote:
Simon,
I didn't notice until today the commit
294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491
On 10/01/2014 09:37 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Gosh. Is there something else relatively common in the PPC world that sells
for
$100-200?
Unlikely. This is high end SoC.
York
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
Hi York,
On 1 October 2014 10:52, York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote:
On 10/01/2014 09:37 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Gosh. Is there something else relatively common in the PPC world that sells
for
$100-200?
Unlikely. This is high end SoC.
Well is there is some PPC board that is supported
On 10/01/2014 11:01 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi York,
On 1 October 2014 10:52, York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote:
On 10/01/2014 09:37 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Gosh. Is there something else relatively common in the PPC world that sells
for
$100-200?
Unlikely. This is high end SoC.
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 09:27 -0700, York Sun wrote:
On 10/01/2014 08:11 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi York,
On 30 September 2014 22:06, York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote:
Simon,
I didn't notice until today the commit
294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke at least
On 10/01/2014 07:15 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
I can change init sequence as far as I put initr_unlock_ram_in_cache before
initr_malloc, T4240QDS still boots.
Yes, we shouldn't have any reason to keep the cache locked that long.
I examine the code but don't understand why I have to do so.
Simon,
I didn't notice until today the commit
294b91a5817147d4b7f47be2ac69bac2a1f26491 broke at least T4240QDS. I have
narrowed down to these two lines in common/board_r.c
initr_barrier,
initr_malloc,
If I move these two lines below this part
#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_LOCK)
9 matches
Mail list logo
