On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Tuomas Tynkkynen
wrote:
> On 09/23/2017 01:26 PM, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> FAT file systems created by GNU mtools have a problem that mtools doesn't
>> initialize the first cluster field of the '.' and '..' directory
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 01:26:38PM +0300, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FAT file systems created by GNU mtools have a problem that mtools
> doesn't initialize the first cluster field of the '.' and '..'
> directory entries. That is, with the following script:
>
> mkdir fattmp
> cd fattmp
>
On 09/23/2017 01:26 PM, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote:
Hi,
FAT file systems created by GNU mtools have a problem that mtools
doesn't initialize the first cluster field of the '.' and '..' directory
entries. That is, with the following script:
Oh, and unrelated to the mtools problem, '..' entries
Hi,
FAT file systems created by GNU mtools have a problem that mtools
doesn't initialize the first cluster field of the '.' and '..' directory
entries. That is, with the following script:
mkdir fattmp
cd fattmp
mkdir -p foo/bar/baz
touch foo/bar/baz/biff
truncate -s 16M ../fattest.img
4 matches
Mail list logo