Re: [U-Boot] FAT filesystems and mtools-created filesystems

2017-09-24 Thread Rob Clark
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote: > On 09/23/2017 01:26 PM, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> FAT file systems created by GNU mtools have a problem that mtools doesn't >> initialize the first cluster field of the '.' and '..' directory

Re: [U-Boot] FAT filesystems and mtools-created filesystems

2017-09-23 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 01:26:38PM +0300, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote: > Hi, > > FAT file systems created by GNU mtools have a problem that mtools > doesn't initialize the first cluster field of the '.' and '..' > directory entries. That is, with the following script: > > mkdir fattmp > cd fattmp >

Re: [U-Boot] FAT filesystems and mtools-created filesystems

2017-09-23 Thread Tuomas Tynkkynen
On 09/23/2017 01:26 PM, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote: Hi, FAT file systems created by GNU mtools have a problem that mtools doesn't initialize the first cluster field of the '.' and '..' directory entries. That is, with the following script: Oh, and unrelated to the mtools problem, '..' entries

[U-Boot] FAT filesystems and mtools-created filesystems

2017-09-23 Thread Tuomas Tynkkynen
Hi, FAT file systems created by GNU mtools have a problem that mtools doesn't initialize the first cluster field of the '.' and '..' directory entries. That is, with the following script: mkdir fattmp cd fattmp mkdir -p foo/bar/baz touch foo/bar/baz/biff truncate -s 16M ../fattest.img