Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2017-05-08 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 09:46:41PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Please take this PR. > > thanks! > Jagan. > > The following changes since commit ac6991fb5fc1a694b29f4ebd5e07baebf818d7cc: > > zynq: spi: Honour the activation / deactivation delay (2017-05-03 11:03:04 > +0530) > >

[U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2017-05-08 Thread Jagan Teki
Hi Tom, Please take this PR. thanks! Jagan. The following changes since commit ac6991fb5fc1a694b29f4ebd5e07baebf818d7cc: zynq: spi: Honour the activation / deactivation delay (2017-05-03 11:03:04 +0530) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-spi.git next for

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2016-01-06 Thread Jagan Teki
On 3 January 2016 at 21:26, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 09:10:14PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On 3 January 2016 at 20:14, Tom Rini wrote: >> > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 09:26:38AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: >> >> On 2 January 2016 at 22:34, Tom

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2016-01-03 Thread Jagan Teki
On 3 January 2016 at 20:14, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 09:26:38AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On 2 January 2016 at 22:34, Tom Rini wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 04:04:23PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: >> > >> >> Tom, >> >> >> >> Please

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2016-01-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 09:10:14PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On 3 January 2016 at 20:14, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 09:26:38AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > >> On 2 January 2016 at 22:34, Tom Rini wrote: > >> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2016-01-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 09:26:38AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On 2 January 2016 at 22:34, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 04:04:23PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > >> Tom, > >> > >> Please note that subject shows u-boot-spi/next but it actually > >>

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2016-01-02 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 04:04:23PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > Tom, > > Please note that subject shows u-boot-spi/next but it actually > u-boot-spi/master and of course PR shows the repo as master (not > next). OK, what in here is a clear bugfix rather than new feature that we should have taken

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2016-01-02 Thread Jagan Teki
On 2 January 2016 at 22:34, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 04:04:23PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > >> Tom, >> >> Please note that subject shows u-boot-spi/next but it actually >> u-boot-spi/master and of course PR shows the repo as master (not >> next). > > OK, what

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-12-31 Thread Jagan Teki
On 30 December 2015 at 16:04, Jagan Teki wrote: > Tom, Please pull this asap, in case if you miss. > > Please note that subject shows u-boot-spi/next but it actually > u-boot-spi/master and of course PR shows the repo as master (not > next). > > On 30 December 2015 at 16:01,

[U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-12-30 Thread Jagan Teki
Hi Tom, Please pull this PR. thanks! Jagan. The following changes since commit 312db9f75f50b339310474d72c8524cef2bd7931: armv7: omap-common: Rework SPL board_mmc_init() (2015-12-14 13:42:54 -0500) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-spi.git master for you to

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-12-30 Thread Jagan Teki
Tom, Please note that subject shows u-boot-spi/next but it actually u-boot-spi/master and of course PR shows the repo as master (not next). On 30 December 2015 at 16:01, Jagan Teki wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Please pull this PR. > > thanks! > Jagan. > > The following changes since

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-11-04 Thread Jagan Teki
On 4 November 2015 at 16:51, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Jagan, > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: > >> Updated u32 to size_t as prototype uses the same. Does this break? it look >> OK? > > Here is the error I see on Blackfin: > >

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-11-04 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: > Yes true, stm_lock and stm_unlock should use size_t for len - Will > update the same. > > With these all built fine? After applying this size_t change plus the three attached bitops patches I sent you for mips, arc. avr32 I

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-11-04 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > After applying this size_t change plus the three attached bitops > patches I sent you for mips, arc. avr32 I do not see any more build > issues here. > > Also, when you apply the three patches to your tree, please make

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-11-04 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Tom, On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >> NAK. >> >> So, this blows up badly for a lot of things when I do: >> ./tools/buildman/buildman -b master --force-build --step 0 -Cdvel >>

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-11-04 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> >>> NAK. >>> >>> So, this blows up badly for a lot of things

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-11-04 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Jagan, On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Tom Rini

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-11-04 Thread Jagan Teki
Fabio, On 4 November 2015 at 16:38, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Jagan, > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >>> Hi Tom, >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:45 AM,

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-11-04 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Jagan, On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: > Updated u32 to size_t as prototype uses the same. Does this break? it look OK? Here is the error I see on Blackfin: Building bf518f-ezbrd board...

[U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-11-03 Thread Jagan Teki
Hi Tom, Please pull this series. thanks! Jagan. The following changes since commit 96d59e9d6aa74e35c63dc74da10e41f8ba0f6de4: mpc85xx/t2081: enable parsing DDR ratio for T2081 rev1.1 (2015-11-02 08:51:50 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-spi.git next

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-11-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:39:56PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Please pull this series. > > thanks! > Jagan. > > The following changes since commit 96d59e9d6aa74e35c63dc74da10e41f8ba0f6de4: > > mpc85xx/t2081: enable parsing DDR ratio for T2081 rev1.1 (2015-11-02 > 08:51:50

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-11-03 Thread Bin Meng
Hi Jagan, On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:39:56PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > >> Hi Tom, >> >> Please pull this series. >> >> thanks! >> Jagan. >> >> The following changes since commit 96d59e9d6aa74e35c63dc74da10e41f8ba0f6de4: >> >>

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-spi/next

2015-11-03 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > NAK. > > So, this blows up badly for a lot of things when I do: > ./tools/buildman/buildman -b master --force-build --step 0 -Cdvel > 'blackfin|microblaze|m68k|nds32|x86|aarch64|sandbox|mips|avr32|arm|powerpc|sh4|sparc' It