Dear Aneesh V,
In message 4f33614d.8020...@ti.com you wrote:
What exactly are you talking about here that was adding a
considerable delay - the memory copy ? Are you really sure about
that?
I didn't measure it part by part, but removing relocation gave a
noticeable speed-up, this
On Thursday 09 February 2012 05:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Aneesh V,
In message4f33614d.8020...@ti.com you wrote:
What exactly are you talking about here that was adding a
considerable delay - the memory copy ? Are you really sure about
that?
I didn't measure it part by part, but
Dear Aneesh V,
In message 4f3219a8.7090...@ti.com you wrote:
As for ignoring comments, I think you are culpable of that more than me
in this specific instance:) (of course I know you are busy person, but
still..). For instance, my arguments in the previous round [1] never
got an answer from
Dear Wolfgang,
On Wednesday 08 February 2012 07:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Aneesh V,
In message4f3219a8.7090...@ti.com you wrote:
As for ignoring comments, I think you are culpable of that more than me
in this specific instance:) (of course I know you are busy person, but
still..).
Dear Aneesh V,
In message 4f328b41.2050...@ti.com you wrote:
But since then I changed my mind due to some other factors:
1. Difficulty in debugging. I use JTAG debuggers. The workarounds
available are still painful and not many people know about it.
We use JTAG debuggers all day, and have
On Wednesday 08 February 2012 09:53 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Aneesh V,
In message4f328b41.2050...@ti.com you wrote:
But since then I changed my mind due to some other factors:
1. Difficulty in debugging. I use JTAG debuggers. The workarounds
available are still painful and not many
Dear Aneesh V,
In message 4f30d06e.8060...@ti.com you wrote:
I agree. Even on some platforms that are not fully static (such as having
variants with different memory sizes) the minimum available memory is
more than enough to allocate big enough partitions for each need at
U-Boot level. And
Dear Wolfgang,
On Wednesday 08 February 2012 04:56 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Aneesh V,
In message4f30d06e.8060...@ti.com you wrote:
I agree. Even on some platforms that are not fully static (such as having
variants with different memory sizes) the minimum available memory is
more than
On Sunday 05 February 2012 11:49 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Aneesh Vane...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Dirk,
On Friday 03 February 2012 12:55 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Hi,
on i.MX6 devices, e.g. ARM2 or SabreLite, the ROM boot loader copies the
U-Boot image from the boot
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Le 04/02/2012 10:15, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Dirk,
On Friday 03 February 2012 12:55 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Hi,
on i.MX6 devices, e.g. ARM2 or SabreLite, the ROM boot loader copies the
U-Boot image from the boot
Hi Tom,
Le 06/02/2012 15:34, Tom Rini a écrit :
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Le 04/02/2012 10:15, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Dirk,
On Friday 03 February 2012 12:55 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Hi,
on i.MX6 devices, e.g. ARM2 or SabreLite, the ROM
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4f304463.1050...@aribaud.net you wrote:
In my experience, the offset is consistent on a given platform so once
you do the dance once to figure out where it'll be placed you can just
start off debugging post-relocation.
That's for a given platform *and* a
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4f304463.1050...@aribaud.net you wrote:
In my experience, the offset is consistent on a given platform so once
you do the dance once to figure out where it'll be placed you can
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 04:11 AM, Graeme Russ wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Wolfgang Denkw...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message4f304463.1050...@aribaud.net you wrote:
In my experience, the offset is consistent on a given platform so once
you do the
Hi Dirk,
On Friday 03 February 2012 12:55 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Hi,
on i.MX6 devices, e.g. ARM2 or SabreLite, the ROM boot loader copies the
U-Boot image from the boot device, e.g. the SD card, to the main memory.
This does mean that U-Boot is started in RAM.
With this, one might wonder why
On Saturday 04 February 2012 04:30 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 04/02/2012 10:15, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Dirk,
On Friday 03 February 2012 12:55 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Hi,
on i.MX6 devices, e.g. ARM2 or SabreLite, the ROM boot loader copies the
U-Boot image from the boot device, e.g. the SD
Le 04/02/2012 12:14, Aneesh V a écrit :
On Saturday 04 February 2012 04:30 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 04/02/2012 10:15, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Dirk,
On Friday 03 February 2012 12:55 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Hi,
on i.MX6 devices, e.g. ARM2 or SabreLite, the ROM boot loader copies
the
U-Boot
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Aneesh V ane...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Dirk,
On Friday 03 February 2012 12:55 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Hi,
on i.MX6 devices, e.g. ARM2 or SabreLite, the ROM boot loader copies the
U-Boot image from the boot device, e.g. the SD card, to the main memory.
This
On 03/02/2012 08:25, Dirk Behme wrote:
Hi,
Hi Dirk,
on i.MX6 devices, e.g. ARM2 or SabreLite, the ROM boot loader copies the
U-Boot image from the boot device, e.g. the SD card, to the main memory.
This does mean that U-Boot is started in RAM.
The same happens on MX5 and on several
On 03.02.2012 09:51, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 03/02/2012 08:25, Dirk Behme wrote:
Hi,
Hi Dirk,
on i.MX6 devices, e.g. ARM2 or SabreLite, the ROM boot loader copies the
U-Boot image from the boot device, e.g. the SD card, to the main memory.
This does mean that U-Boot is started in RAM.
On 03/02/2012 11:18, Dirk Behme wrote:
Ok, understood :) Do you have any pointers or hints how to implement a
board specific relocation skip? Just in case somebody wants us to
implement this for a specific i.MX6 board ...
Not really - I think you have to dig into the git history, when we
On Friday 03 February 2012 06:00:57 Stefano Babic wrote:
On 03/02/2012 11:18, Dirk Behme wrote:
Ok, understood :) Do you have any pointers or hints how to implement a
board specific relocation skip? Just in case somebody wants us to
implement this for a specific i.MX6 board ...
Not
Hi,
on i.MX6 devices, e.g. ARM2 or SabreLite, the ROM boot loader copies the
U-Boot image from the boot device, e.g. the SD card, to the main memory.
This does mean that U-Boot is started in RAM.
With this, one might wonder why any relocation RAM - RAM is done anyway
and if this could be
23 matches
Mail list logo
