On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 06:35:27AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Tom,
Am 28.05.2013 23:16, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:01:09PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom,
In message 20130528172309.GF5829@bill-the-cat you wrote:
Of course this can't yet apply to
Hello Wolfgang,
Am 28.05.2013 07:58, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Heiko,
In message 51a42ccd.1020...@denx.de you wrote:
I would imagine, but testing and implementation might show a better way,
we do UBI as name ubi ubiN volume-name, ie:
rootfs ubi ubi0 rootfs
user ubi ubi0 user-data
and
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:50:46AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom,
In message 20130527233735.GZ17119@bill-the-cat you wrote:
Where exactly is this 8 MB limit coming into play?
In buffering the data. We cannot write a chunk of a file to a
filesystem and then append to it, we
Hi Tom,
On May 28, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:50:46AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom,
In message 20130527233735.GZ17119@bill-the-cat you wrote:
Where exactly is this 8 MB limit coming into play?
In buffering the data. We cannot write a chunk of
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Heiko,
In message 51a427a8.8090...@denx.de you wrote:
Where exactly is this 8 MB limit coming into play?
You find this in drivers/dfu/dfu.c:
static unsigned char __aligned(CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE)
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:24:06AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Wolfgang,
Am 28.05.2013 07:58, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Heiko,
In message 51a42ccd.1020...@denx.de you wrote:
I would imagine, but testing and implementation might show a better way,
we do UBI as name ubi
Dear Pantelis Antoniou,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:05:12 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Tom,
On May 28, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:50:46AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom,
In message 20130527233735.GZ17119@bill-the-cat you wrote:
Where
Hi Benoît
On May 28, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Dear Pantelis Antoniou,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:05:12 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Tom,
On May 28, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:50:46AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom,
In
Hi Pantelis,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 6:43:06 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Benoît
On May 28, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Dear Pantelis Antoniou,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:05:12 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Tom,
On May 28, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
Hi
On May 28, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 6:43:06 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Benoît
On May 28, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Dear Pantelis Antoniou,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:05:12 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 06:31:41PM +0200, Beno??t Th??baudeau wrote:
[snip]
Of course this can't yet apply to writing files on file systems since the
current API in U-Boot misses the append feature, but this could be applied to
program raw memory partitions, including UBI images.
Correct. We
Dear Tom,
In message 20130528172309.GF5829@bill-the-cat you wrote:
Of course this can't yet apply to writing files on file systems since the
current API in U-Boot misses the append feature, but this could be applied
to
program raw memory partitions, including UBI images.
Correct. We
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:01:09PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom,
In message 20130528172309.GF5829@bill-the-cat you wrote:
Of course this can't yet apply to writing files on file systems since the
current API in U-Boot misses the append feature, but this could be
applied to
Hello Tom,
Am 28.05.2013 23:16, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:01:09PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom,
In message 20130528172309.GF5829@bill-the-cat you wrote:
Of course this can't yet apply to writing files on file systems since the
current API in U-Boot misses the
Hi Heiko,
Hello Tom,
Am 24.05.2013 19:12, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:42:01PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Heiko,
On May 24, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello,
just digging in DFU support in U-Boot for an upcoming board
support based on an
Hello Lukasz,
Am 27.05.2013 09:02, schrieb Lukasz Majewski:
Hi Heiko,
Hello Tom,
Am 24.05.2013 19:12, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:42:01PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Heiko,
On May 24, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello,
just digging in DFU support
Hi Guys,
On May 27, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Lukasz,
Am 27.05.2013 09:02, schrieb Lukasz Majewski:
Hi Heiko,
Hello Tom,
Am 24.05.2013 19:12, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:42:01PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Heiko,
On May 24, 2013, at
Hello,
Am 27.05.2013 09:35, schrieb Pantelis Antoniou:
Hi Guys,
On May 27, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Lukasz,
Am 27.05.2013 09:02, schrieb Lukasz Majewski:
Hi Heiko,
Hello Tom,
Am 24.05.2013 19:12, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:42:01PM +0300,
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 51a30f34.7030...@denx.de you wrote:
But how to handle a raw nand partition and a ubi partition on one
nand?
If ubi is a new dfu interface, somebody must start dfu on u-boot
with dfu nand .. or dfu ubi .. dependent on which partition
has to be updated ...
Hi
On May 27, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 51a30f34.7030...@denx.de you wrote:
But how to handle a raw nand partition and a ubi partition on one
nand?
If ubi is a new dfu interface, somebody must start dfu on u-boot
with dfu nand .. or dfu
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 09:09:22AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
[snip]
Ah, looking in drivers/dfu/dfu_mmc.c, they use dfu-layout
for switching between DFU_RAW_ADDR, DFU_FS_FAT, DFU_FS_EXT4...
After all ... should we add a DFU_UBI and add this to
drivers/dfu/dfu_nand.c?
Yes, I think we
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 07:29:02PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi
On May 27, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 51a30f34.7030...@denx.de you wrote:
But how to handle a raw nand partition and a ubi partition on one
nand?
If ubi is a
Dear Tom,
In message 20130527204127.GY17119@bill-the-cat you wrote:
This _may_ be the hard part for UBI. When doing raw block writes for
NAND/MMC, we're able to write them out quickly and thus support images
larger than RAM. But for filesystems we don't support that notion in
general for
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:25:52PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom,
In message 20130527204127.GY17119@bill-the-cat you wrote:
This _may_ be the hard part for UBI. When doing raw block writes for
NAND/MMC, we're able to write them out quickly and thus support images
larger than
Hello Wolfgang,
Am 27.05.2013 23:25, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Tom,
In message 20130527204127.GY17119@bill-the-cat you wrote:
This _may_ be the hard part for UBI. When doing raw block writes for
NAND/MMC, we're able to write them out quickly and thus support images
larger than RAM.
Hello Tom,
Am 27.05.2013 21:21, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 09:09:22AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
[snip]
Ah, looking in drivers/dfu/dfu_mmc.c, they use dfu-layout
for switching between DFU_RAW_ADDR, DFU_FS_FAT, DFU_FS_EXT4...
After all ... should we add a DFU_UBI and add
Hello Tom,
Am 27.05.2013 22:41, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 07:29:02PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi
On May 27, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 51a30f34.7030...@denx.de you wrote:
[...]
I pretty much agree. UBI looks like it's
Dear Tom,
In message 20130527233735.GZ17119@bill-the-cat you wrote:
Where exactly is this 8 MB limit coming into play?
In buffering the data. We cannot write a chunk of a file to a
filesystem and then append to it, we don't have the API today.
Sorry, I still don't get it. Assuming I
Dear Heiko,
In message 51a427a8.8090...@denx.de you wrote:
Where exactly is this 8 MB limit coming into play?
You find this in drivers/dfu/dfu.c:
static unsigned char __aligned(CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE)
dfu_buf[DFU_DATA_BUF_SIZE];
Ah, so it is a DFU
Dear Heiko,
In message 51a42ccd.1020...@denx.de you wrote:
I would imagine, but testing and implementation might show a better way,
we do UBI as name ubi ubiN volume-name, ie:
rootfs ubi ubi0 rootfs
user ubi ubi0 user-data
and so forth, and augment dfu_nand.c with UBI knowledge, ala
Hello Tom,
Am 24.05.2013 19:12, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:42:01PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Heiko,
On May 24, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello,
just digging in DFU support in U-Boot for an upcoming board support
based on an AM335x. This board
Hello,
just digging in DFU support in U-Boot for an upcoming board support
based on an AM335x. This board support uses for example a rootfs in
an UBI Volume on a NAND flash, and this should be updated with dfu ...
How To do this? Current state on this board is to erase the rootfs
mtd partition
Hi Heiko,
On May 24, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello,
just digging in DFU support in U-Boot for an upcoming board support
based on an AM335x. This board support uses for example a rootfs in
an UBI Volume on a NAND flash, and this should be updated with dfu ...
How To do
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:42:01PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Heiko,
On May 24, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello,
just digging in DFU support in U-Boot for an upcoming board support
based on an AM335x. This board support uses for example a rootfs in
an UBI
Dear Pantelis Antoniou,
In message 6ad958cb-3cfc-4362-b72d-511147d04...@antoniou-consulting.com you
wrote:
How To do this? Current state on this board is to erase the rootfs
mtd partition with a nand erase and write the new image using
dfu_nand.c ... which calls in the end nand_write ...
35 matches
Mail list logo
