Hi Stephan,
Of course you can post patches ! Any fix is always high appreciated !
I figured patches on a different repo were a bit 'unusual', but I'll clean up
my work and
submit my patch soon.
Exactly which kernel version ? Do you tried with mainline kernel ? The
board is officially
Hi Stephan,
Of course you can post patches ! Any fix is always high appreciated !
I figured patches on a different repo were a bit 'unusual', but I'll clean
up my work and submit my patch soon.
Exactly which kernel version ? Do you tried with mainline kernel ? The
board is
On 13/01/2012 13:56, Robert Deliën wrote:
Looks like CPUfreq+usb is doing something eerie ... Fabio, can you look into
it?
I've Kernel 3.2.1 and it works. So I've made a clean-built of my 3.1.6 and
works
too. No idea why it failed before, but I'm going to disregard that for now. I
think
On 13/01/2012 13:56, Robert Deliën wrote:
Looks like CPUfreq+usb is doing something eerie ... Fabio, can you look
into it?
I've Kernel 3.2.1 and it works. So I've made a clean-built of my 3.1.6
and works too. No idea why it failed before, but I'm going to disregard
that for now. I
Hi Robert,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
Unfortunately we cannot step up to another Kernel because we need the
FreeScale power supply driver for our battery and that's not yet supported in
later Kernel versions.
However, the logical approach is to
I've Kernel 3.2.1 and it works. So I've made a clean-built of my 3.1.6 and
works
too. No idea why it failed before, but I'm going to disregard that for now.
I think
it's safe to conclude that the problem is an incompatibility between the
FreeScale supplied 2.6.35.3-571 Kernel and the
About the 2.6.35 cpufreq bug you see: I remember to see a patch for
it. Let me locate it and I will point it to you.
If there's anything you can remember, please throw it at me: Anything
is useful.
Or simply try to disable cpufreq if you need a quick workaround for 2.6.35.
I'll try that
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Robert Deliën rob...@delien.nl wrote:
Hi Stefano,
Can I post a patch for your u-boot-imx tree with my integration of extra
subsystems for the mx28evk board, or should I wait until your work on
mx28evk_config is in the mainline?
I think it is OK if you post
8 matches
Mail list logo