Dear Tom,
In message <20140923134613.GC25506@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> > What about the u-boot-uniphier repository?
>
> I thought that was done already, oops, so yes, that's fine too.
Done now, thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:43:02PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20140923125419.GB25506@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > OK, I've thought about this a lot. I think the best way forward is to
> > have a new tree on git.denx.de, u-boot-socfpga that Marek will run for
> >
Dear Tom,
In message <20140923125419.GB25506@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> OK, I've thought about this a lot. I think the best way forward is to
> have a new tree on git.denx.de, u-boot-socfpga that Marek will run for
> the v2014.10 merge window. This will give the Altera team time to get
> up t
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 04:54:05AM -0500, Chin Liang See wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 06:54 -0500, Chin Liang See wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 11:56 +0200, ZY - pavel wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > > I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far,
> > > > >
Hi guys,
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 06:54 -0500, Chin Liang See wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 11:56 +0200, ZY - pavel wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far, we
> > > > don't
> > > > have a repo for this platform and there is a large flurry of p
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 11:56 +0200, ZY - pavel wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far, we
> > > don't
> > > have a repo for this platform and there is a large flurry of patches
> > > flying
> > > around without any kind of central point for them. I
Hi!
> > I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far, we don't
> > have a repo for this platform and there is a large flurry of patches flying
> > around without any kind of central point for them. I'd like to get your
> > formal
> > consent for starting this and if you agre
On Monday, September 15, 2014 at 03:43:39 AM, Chin Liang See wrote:
> Dear Marex,
[..]
> > > This is actually a big patch which should be split to smaller patch.
> > > Nevertheless, I already started reviewing it last week and hopefully
> > > can get it reviewed by today.
> >
> > I did manage to s
Dear Marex,
On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 03:27 +0200, ma...@denx.de wrote:
> On Monday, September 15, 2014 at 03:07:11 AM, Chin Liang See wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 12:46 -0400, ZY - trini wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:02:08AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > > Hi Wolfgang
Dear Wolfgang,
On Sat, 2014-09-13 at 00:37 +0200, ZY - wd wrote:
> Dear Dinh,
>
> In message <5413667d.50...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
> >
> > Wolfgang's advice is valuable and noted. However, it is in Altera's
> > best interest that we have 1 central gathering point for all our
> > opens
On Monday, September 15, 2014 at 03:07:11 AM, Chin Liang See wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 12:46 -0400, ZY - trini wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:02:08AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > Hi Wolfgang,
> > >
> > > On 9/12/14, 5:51 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > > Dear Dinh,
> > >
Hi Tom,
On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 12:46 -0400, ZY - trini wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:02:08AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > Hi Wolfgang,
> >
> > On 9/12/14, 5:51 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > Dear Dinh,
> > >
> > > In message <541373ad.4020...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
> > Also, I w
Hi Dinh,
From day one of the SOCFPGA project, we(Altera's Linux/U-boot's
development team have made a pledge to upstream as much support as
possible and to be as open as possible. The thought behind rocketboards
was also a central point of information for socfpga, that would include
patches for
Dear Dinh,
In message <5415bc00.6090...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
>
> FWIW, I strongly oppose assigning an external person to be the custodian
> for socfpga. Marek is fantastic developer, and my only issue is that he
> is not an Altera employee. I contend that an in-house custodian for
>
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:02:08AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On 9/12/14, 5:51 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Dinh,
> >
> > In message <541373ad.4020...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
> >>
> >> Then I vote for myself as the custodian for u-boot-socfpga. By the way,
> >
>
Dear Dinh,
In message <5415b6a7.9020...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> I think the point has shifted that Wolfgang wants to appoint an external
> entity to be the custodian for u-boot-socfpga-next.
You misunderstand me. It is not up to me to decide who the custodian
shall be. This is a community de
Hi Wolfgang,
On 9/12/14, 5:51 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Dinh,
>
> In message <541373ad.4020...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
>>
>> Then I vote for myself as the custodian for u-boot-socfpga. By the way,
>
> May I ask what made you change your mind like that? First you wrote
> that Vin
Hi David,
On 9/13/14, 12:24 PM, David Hawkins wrote:
> Hi Dinh,
>
>>> Up until now I have avoided any SoC development kits as
>>> I considered the software support to not have matured
>>> enough. I consider "mature" code to be code that I can
>>> checkout from mainline, where mainline is U-Boot v
Hi Dinh,
Up until now I have avoided any SoC development kits as
I considered the software support to not have matured
enough. I consider "mature" code to be code that I can
checkout from mainline, where mainline is U-Boot via the
Denx repos, and Linux via the Kernel repos.
For Linux, we have
Hi all,
Texas Instruments has recently realized that this
is the way to go, and have invested significantly
in this area - as demonstrated by Tom Rini.
TI have dedicated a page to mainlining:
http://www.ti.com/lsds/ti/tools-software/mainlinelinux.page
TI also has a very nice article in Electr
Dear Dinh,
In message <541373ad.4020...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
>
> Then I vote for myself as the custodian for u-boot-socfpga. By the way,
May I ask what made you change your mind like that? First you wrote
that Vince was assigned to to that, and now it's suddenly you? As far
as I ca
Dear Dinh,
In message <5413667d.50...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
>
> Wolfgang's advice is valuable and noted. However, it is in Altera's
> best interest that we have 1 central gathering point for all our
> opensource software support.
Full agreement here. But I would like to point out tha
On 09/12/2014 05:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Dinh,
>
> In message <54136276.6040...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
>>
>>> To get patches or new code into U-Boot mainline, these have to be
>>> submitted to the U-Boot mailing list (among other purposes for
>>> archival and that they get st
Dear Dinh,
In message <54136276.6040...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
>
> > To get patches or new code into U-Boot mainline, these have to be
> > submitted to the U-Boot mailing list (among other purposes for
> > archival and that they get stored in the patchwork database). Then a
> > peer re
On 09/12/2014 04:05 PM, David Hawkins wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm going to jump in here with an end-user's perspective,
> along with an offer of assistance/contribution.
>
> I'm interested in using Altera's SOCs in my designs.
> Altera guys - if you look over on the Altera Forum,
> you will see tha
On 09/12/2014 02:46 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Dinh,
>
> In message <54133b22.2090...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
>>
>>> So I suggest we create u-boot-socfpga now, as this will be needed
>>> in any case when any significant amount of patches is coming in for
>>> mainline.
>>>
>>> For no
Hi Dave
Il 12/set/2014 23:23 "David Hawkins" ha scritto:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
>
>> We know and thank you very much for price list ;)
>
>
> I hope my incomplete list of vendors did not offend you.
> I'm board vendor agnostic. If your company has an
> Altera SoC board, I'm more than happy to look at i
Hi Michael,
We know and thank you very much for price list ;)
I hope my incomplete list of vendors did not offend you.
I'm board vendor agnostic. If your company has an
Altera SoC board, I'm more than happy to look at it too.
Feel free to offer alternative options :)
Cheers,
Dave
__
Hi
Il 12/set/2014 23:16 "David Hawkins" ha scritto:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm going to jump in here with an end-user's perspective,
> along with an offer of assistance/contribution.
>
> I'm interested in using Altera's SOCs in my designs.
> Altera guys - if you look over on the Altera Forum,
> you wil
Hi guys,
I'm going to jump in here with an end-user's perspective,
along with an offer of assistance/contribution.
I'm interested in using Altera's SOCs in my designs.
Altera guys - if you look over on the Altera Forum,
you will see that I am very active over there
(basically answering everyone'
Hi all
Il 12/set/2014 21:53 "Dinh Nguyen" ha
scritto:
>
> On 09/12/2014 12:25 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Dinh,
> >
> > In message <54122de5.1080...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
> >>
> >> Understood...You have just lit a fire in our arses! We have added a
> >> resource internally, Vinc
On 09/12/2014 12:25 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Dinh,
>
> In message <54122de5.1080...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
>>
>> Understood...You have just lit a fire in our arses! We have added a
>> resource internally, Vince Bridgers, to help us upstream more u-boot
>> support. Also, now that
Dear Dinh,
In message <54133b22.2090...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
>
> > So I suggest we create u-boot-socfpga now, as this will be needed
> > in any case when any significant amount of patches is coming in for
> > mainline.
> >
> > For now, we assing Marek as custodian - he has volunteere
Dear Michal,
In message <541334d0.80...@monstr.eu> you wrote:
>
> But creating separate repository for every SoC in u-boot seems to me
> just too much.
We're not talking about one repo for every SoC here.
> Definitely I also really appreciate that Marek volunteers to be responsible
> for socfpga
Hi Wolfgang,
On 09/11/2014 09:46 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Michal,
>
> In message <54112b64.5010...@monstr.eu> you wrote:
>>
>> I am not sure if you need to have separate repo to work like this.
>> I am keeping zynq patches in my microblaze repo and sending pull request
>> to Albert
>> (or
Dear Dinh,
In message <54122de5.1080...@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
>
> Understood...You have just lit a fire in our arses! We have added a
> resource internally, Vince Bridgers, to help us upstream more u-boot
> support. Also, now that Linux support for SOCFPGA is decent, I will
> focus mor
On 09/11/2014 12:14 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:14:55AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Michal,
>>>
>>> In message <54112b64.5010...@monstr.eu> you wrote:
I am not sure if you need to have separate repo to w
On 09/11/2014 11:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, September 11, 2014 at 06:14:55 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Michal,
>>>
>>> In message <54112b64.5010...@monstr.eu> you wrote:
I am not sure if you need to have separate repo
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 at 06:01:31 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far, we
> > don't have a repo for this platform and there is a large flurry of
> > patches fly
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:14:55AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Michal,
> >
> > In message <54112b64.5010...@monstr.eu> you wrote:
> >>
> >> I am not sure if you need to have separate repo to work like this.
> >> I am keeping zynq patch
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 at 06:14:55 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Michal,
> >
> > In message <54112b64.5010...@monstr.eu> you wrote:
> >> I am not sure if you need to have separate repo to work like this.
> >> I am keeping zynq pat
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 at 09:46:18 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Michal,
>
> In message <54112b64.5010...@monstr.eu> you wrote:
> > I am not sure if you need to have separate repo to work like this.
> > I am keeping zynq patches in my microblaze repo and sending pull request
> > to Albe
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 at 09:55:55 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > In socfpga case I think there are guys from Altera who maintain it.
> >
> > Well, they maintain the stuff at rocketboards.org ; there are efforts
> > on the way to mainline stuff, but the process is not exactly
> >
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 at 06:56:04 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/11/2014 05:09 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 01:33:20 +0200
> >
> > Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far, we
> >> don't
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far, we don't
> have a repo for this platform and there is a large flurry of patches flying
> around without any kind of central point for them. I'd like to get your form
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Michal,
>
> In message <54112b64.5010...@monstr.eu> you wrote:
>>
>> I am not sure if you need to have separate repo to work like this.
>> I am keeping zynq patches in my microblaze repo and sending pull request
>> to Albert
>> (or Tom n
Hi!
> > In socfpga case I think there are guys from Altera who maintain it.
>
> Well, they maintain the stuff at rocketboards.org ; there are efforts
> on the way to mainline stuff, but the process is not exactly
> satisfactory. I highly appreciate that Marek volunteers to put
> efforts in this.
Dear Michal,
In message <54112b64.5010...@monstr.eu> you wrote:
>
> I am not sure if you need to have separate repo to work like this.
> I am keeping zynq patches in my microblaze repo and sending pull request
> to Albert
> (or Tom now) and there is no problem with that.
Well, technically of cour
Hi Michal,
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 06:56:04 +0200
Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/11/2014 05:09 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 01:33:20 +0200
> > Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far, we
> >>
Hi,
On 09/11/2014 05:09 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 01:33:20 +0200
> Marek Vasut wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far, we don't
>> have a repo for this platform and there is a large flurry of patches flying
>> aroun
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 01:33:20 +0200
Marek Vasut wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far, we don't
> have a repo for this platform and there is a large flurry of patches flying
> around without any kind of central point for them. I'd like to get yo
Hello,
I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far, we don't
have a repo for this platform and there is a large flurry of patches flying
around without any kind of central point for them. I'd like to get your formal
consent for starting this and if you agree, I'd start se
52 matches
Mail list logo
