enruo ; linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug in BTRFS w/ Duplication
On 2022/12/30 23:28, Sam Winchenbach wrote:
> I believe you fixed the issue with the patch you presented. I was in the
> process of testing a similar fix for release and it solved the issue I
> encountered.
; Marek Behún
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Qu Wenruo ; linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug in BTRFS w/ Duplication
On 2022/12/29 22:12, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 12/28/22 21:51, Sam Winchenbach wrote:
Hello,
Hello, I have hit the following situation when trying to load files
To: Heinrich Schuchardt ; Sam Winchenbach
; Marek Behún
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Qu Wenruo ; linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug in BTRFS w/ Duplication
On 2022/12/29 22:12, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 12/28/22 21:51, Sam Winchenbach wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>&
On 2022/12/29 22:12, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 12/28/22 21:51, Sam Winchenbach wrote:
Hello,
Hello, I have hit the following situation when trying to load files
from a BTRFS partition with duplication enabled.
You mean multi-device?
For DUP/RAID1 duplication, they don't have stripe
On 12/28/22 21:51, Sam Winchenbach wrote:
Hello,
Hello, I have hit the following situation when trying to load files from a
BTRFS partition with duplication enabled.
In the first example I read a 16KiB file - __btrfs_map_block() changes the
length to something larger than the file being
Hello,
Hello, I have hit the following situation when trying to load files from a
BTRFS partition with duplication enabled.
In the first example I read a 16KiB file - __btrfs_map_block() changes the
length to something larger than the file being read. This works fine, as length
is later
6 matches
Mail list logo
