On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Jit Loon Lim wrote:
> From: Chin Liang See
>
> An old inffast.c optimization turns out to not be optimal anymore
> with modern compilers, and furthermore was not compliant with the
> C standard, for which decrementing a pointer before its allocated
>
> > > An old inffast.c optimization turns out to not be optimal anymore
> > > with modern compilers, and furthermore was not compliant with the
> > > C standard, for which decrementing a pointer before its allocated
> > > memory is undefined. Per the recommendation of a security audit of
> > > the
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 04:16:12PM +0300, Sergei Antonov wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Sept 2022 at 11:47, Jit Loon Lim wrote:
> >
> > From: Chin Liang See
> >
> > An old inffast.c optimization turns out to not be optimal anymore
> > with modern compilers, and furthermore was not compliant with the
> > C
On Sun, 11 Sept 2022 at 11:47, Jit Loon Lim wrote:
>
> From: Chin Liang See
>
> An old inffast.c optimization turns out to not be optimal anymore
> with modern compilers, and furthermore was not compliant with the
> C standard, for which decrementing a pointer before its allocated
> memory is
t; > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 9:24 PM
> > > > To: Tan, Ley Foon
> > > > Cc: Ley Foon Tan ; ZY - u-boot > > > b...@lists.denx.de>; See, Chin Liang
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: zlib: Use post-increment only in inffast.c
> > > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Rini
> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 9:52 AM
> To: Tan, Ley Foon
> Cc: Ley Foon Tan ; ZY - u-boot b...@lists.denx.de>; See, Chin Liang
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: zlib: Use post-increment only in inffast.c
>
> On Fri,
> > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 8:37 PM
> > > > To: Ley Foon Tan
> > > > Cc: Tan, Ley Foon ; ZY - u-boot > > > b...@lists.denx.de>; See, Chin Liang
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: zlib: Use post-increment only in inffast.c
> > > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Rini
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 9:24 PM
> To: Tan, Ley Foon
> Cc: Ley Foon Tan ; ZY - u-boot b...@lists.denx.de>; See, Chin Liang
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: zlib: Use post-increment only in inffast.c
>
> On Wed,
Liang
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: zlib: Use post-increment only in inffast.c
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 04:40:00AM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 9:29 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed,
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Rini
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 8:37 PM
> To: Ley Foon Tan
> Cc: Tan, Ley Foon ; ZY - u-boot b...@lists.denx.de>; See, Chin Liang
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: zlib: Use post-increment only in inffast.c
>
> On Fri,
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 04:40:00AM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 9:29 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 04:34:03PM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> >
> > > From: Chin Liang See
> > >
> > > This fixes CVE-2016-9841. Changes integrated from [1], with changes
> >
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 9:29 PM Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 04:34:03PM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>
> > From: Chin Liang See
> >
> > This fixes CVE-2016-9841. Changes integrated from [1], with changes
> > make for Uboot code base.
> >
> > An old inffast.c optimization turns out
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 04:34:03PM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> From: Chin Liang See
>
> This fixes CVE-2016-9841. Changes integrated from [1], with changes
> make for Uboot code base.
>
> An old inffast.c optimization turns out to not be optimal anymore
> with modern compilers, and
13 matches
Mail list logo