Re: caching BLOBLISTT_SPL_HANDOFF

Hi Rasmus, On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 13:01, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > On 02/03/2020 20.47, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Rasmus, > > > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 16:09, Rasmus Villemoes > > wrote: > >> > > >> Now that particular one seems a bit fishy: Why is it ok to cache the > >> location of the

Re: caching BLOBLISTT_SPL_HANDOFF

On 02/03/2020 20.47, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Rasmus, > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 16:09, Rasmus Villemoes > wrote: >> >> Now that particular one seems a bit fishy: Why is it ok to cache the >> location of the BLOBLISTT_SPL_HANDOFF blob in gd->spl_handoff? Later in >> the init sequence there's a

Re: caching BLOBLISTT_SPL_HANDOFF (was Re: [PATCH] common/board_f.c: use #ifdefs a little more consistently)

Hi Rasmus, On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 16:09, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > On 28/02/2020 18.35, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 05:24:58PM +, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > >> eliminated, and there's not an #ifdef in sight. > > > > That sounds pretty nice actually. If you're so inclined

caching BLOBLISTT_SPL_HANDOFF (was Re: [PATCH] common/board_f.c: use #ifdefs a little more consistently)

On 28/02/2020 18.35, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 05:24:58PM +, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> eliminated, and there's not an #ifdef in sight. > > That sounds pretty nice actually. If you're so inclined I'd like to see > it. > So I started looking at that, and while it's mostly