Re: dwc_eth_qos driver for tegra

2022-05-23 Thread Marek Vasut
On 5/23/22 13:46, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: On 23/05/2022 12.57, Marek Vasut wrote: On 5/23/22 11:17, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: Hi Hi, I'm looking at switching the dwc_eth_qos driver over to use dm_eth_phy_connect(). However, I'm a little puzzled by the code for the tegra variant. The comment

Re: dwc_eth_qos driver for tegra

2022-05-23 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On 23/05/2022 12.57, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 5/23/22 11:17, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> Hi > > Hi, > >> I'm looking at switching the dwc_eth_qos driver over to use >> dm_eth_phy_connect(). However, I'm a little puzzled by the code for the >> tegra variant. The comment at the top of the file, as

Re: dwc_eth_qos driver for tegra

2022-05-23 Thread Marek Vasut
On 5/23/22 11:17, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: Hi Hi, I'm looking at switching the dwc_eth_qos driver over to use dm_eth_phy_connect(). However, I'm a little puzzled by the code for the tegra variant. The comment at the top of the file, as well as tegra186.dtsi, says phy-mode = "rgmii"; But

dwc_eth_qos driver for tegra

2022-05-23 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
Hi I'm looking at switching the dwc_eth_qos driver over to use dm_eth_phy_connect(). However, I'm a little puzzled by the code for the tegra variant. The comment at the top of the file, as well as tegra186.dtsi, says phy-mode = "rgmii"; But eqos_get_interface_tegra186() returns a hard-coded