Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH V2] Fix checking fat32 cluster size.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > This patch fix the checking of cluster size in fat32 filesystem. > The current implementation was broken. Currently implementation > of vfat support does't work if the referred cluster has an > offset > 16bit rapresentation. fatload ide 0:1 > and fat

[U-Boot-Users] take part in paid surveys from ho me

Hi, We are recruiting motivated individuals for participating in well-paying online surveys, focus groups and previewing movie trailers. No experience is needed and the job is strictly online. All you need is a little time to voice your opinion about different kinds of online products and servic

[U-Boot-Users] She is trying to damage your reputation

Women hate their dream guy to have a small willy, it ruins everything.- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/_

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH V2] Fix checking fat32 cluster size.

This patch fix the checking of cluster size in fat32 filesystem. The current implementation was broken. Currently implementation of vfat support does't work if the referred cluster has an offset > 16bit rapresentation. fatload ide 0:1 and fatls etc doesn't work properly. Signed-off-by: michael

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot v1.3.2-rc3 released

Hi everybody, the third (and hopefully last) release candidate for U-Boot v1.3.2 has been released and is available form both the git repository and the FTP server. Board maintainers - please test and post patches ASAP! The plan is to have a final release of v1.3.2 not later than March 10

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Fat32 cluster size

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I post a patch for fix checking of cluster size in fat32. Currently > implementation > of vfat support does't work if the referred cluster has an offset > > 16bit rapresentation. > fatload ide 0:1 > fatls etc > doesn't work properly. I would really

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix checking fat32 cluster size.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > This patch fix the checking of cluster size in fat32 filesystem. > The current implementation was broken. > > Signed-off-by: michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We need a full name for the Signed-off-by. Also, instead of "implementation was broken" you shou

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: EMAC: Fix 405EZ fifo size setup in EMAC_MR1

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The 405EZ only supports 512 bytes of rx-/tx-fifo EMAC sizes. But > currently 4k/2k is configured. This patch fixes this issue. > > Thanks to Thomas Kindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for pointing this out. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix alignment error on ARM for modules

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Fix alignment fault on ARM when running modules. With out an explicit > linker file gcc4.2.1 will half word align __bss_start's value. The word > dereference will crash hello_world. > > signed-off-by Richard Woodruff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, than

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fs: Fix the ext2 read issue

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The ext2 aligned process will corrupt the key > data struct, the patch fix this. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > fs/ext2/dev.c | 16 > 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Best r

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] add cscope build target

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Add cscope build target to generate cscope database for code browsing. > > Signed-off-by: Li Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Mu

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 0/2] actua1/actua2/actua3: Fix multiple unused variable

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > - actua1: > actux1.c: In function 'checkboard': > actux1.c:92: warning: unused variable 'revision' > > - actua2: > actux2.c: In function 'checkboard': > actux2.c:100: warning: unused variable 's' > actux2.c:99: warning: unus

Re: [U-Boot-Users] latest u-boot (1.3.2-rc2) and dataflash vs CFG_NO_FLASH

Dear Matt, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > If I try to copy from Ram to dataflash, u-boot says "Copy to Flash..." > and the CPU pukes; it's detecting what it thinks is flash. > > If I #define CFG_NO_FLASH, other stuff breaks. If I fix that by > changing include/flash.h to remove t

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] net: uec_phy: handle 88e1111 rev.B2 erratum 5.6

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Wolfgang, > > Please pull directly into 1.3.2 if possible Sure, done. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] net: uec_phy: handle 88e1111 rev.B2 erratum 5.6

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > erratum 5.6 states the autoneg completion bit is functional only if the > autoneg bit is asserted. > > This fixes any secondarily-issued networking commands on non-gigabit > links on the mpc8360 mds board. > > Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx.git

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Argh. I didn't notice the last one was somewhat malformed. The newer git > "helpfully" checks the remote to make sure this request is sensible, and > failed due to the corporate firewall. Anyway, I've solved the problem in > my script, and these patche

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx.git

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > are available in the git repository at: > > git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-mpc85xx.git ..BRANCH.NOT.VERIFIED.. Hmmm... Could you please be a bit more specific about which branch to use? For now I'll assume "master" ... > Andy Fleming (2): > Inva

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] MPC5121e ADS PCI support take 3

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Adds PCI support for MPC5121 > > Tested with drivers/net/rtl8139.c > > Support is conditional since pci on old silicon > does not work. > > ads5121_PCI_config turns on PCI > > In this version, condition compilation of PCI code has > been moved from if

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix warnings while compilation of post/drivers/memory.c

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Fix warnings while compilation with new gcc in eldk-4.2 > > Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 86xx: Fix renamed GUR symbols in sbc8641d board.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Back in commit a551cee99ad1d1da20fd23ad265de47448852f56 > (86xx: Fix GUR PCI config registers properly), we should have > changed the MPC86xx_PORBMSR_HA and MPC86xx_PORDEVSR_IO_SEL > symbols in the sbc8641d board as well. Fix this oversight. > > Signed-

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot v1.3.2-rc2 released

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > Board maintainers - please test and post patches ASAP! > > A pull of u-boot-86xx will clean up the sbc8641d build. Pulled, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Mu

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix problem in 4xx_enet.c driver

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > U-Boot crashes in the net loop if CONFIG_4xx_DCACHE is > enabled. To reproduce the problem ensure that 'ethrotate' > environment variable isn't set to "no" and then run > "tftp 20 not_existent_file". > This patch tries to fix the issue. > > Signed-of

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] POST: Disable cache while SPR POST

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Currently (since commit b2e2142c) u-boot crashes on > sequoia board while SPR test if CONFIG_4xx_DCACHE is > enabled. This patch disables the cache while SPR test. > > Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > post/cpu/ppc4xx/spr.c |

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] TQM5200: use automatic fdt memory fixup

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Call fdt_fixup_memory() on the boards TQM5200, TQM5200_B, TQM5200S, > TB5200 and TB5200_B to fixup the /memory node with the memory values > detected by U-Boot. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks. > I forgot to include

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [ppc4xx] Please pull git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The following changes since commit b29661fc115106454288051bc9a488351ce8: > Wolfgang Denk (1): > Coding style cleanup. Prepare v1.3.2-rc2 release candidate > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4x

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Pull request:[ARM]

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Please pull from the merge branch at git://denx.de/git/u-boot-arm.git master Done, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebe

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] TQM5200: use automatic fdt memory fixup

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Call fdt_fixup_memory() on the boards TQM5200, TQM5200_B, TQM5200S, > TB5200 and TB5200_B to fixup the /memory node with the memory values > detected by U-Boot. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfga

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] TQM5200: fix bug in SDRAM initialization code

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This patch fixes a bug in the SDRAM initialization code for the > TQM5200. The hi_addr bit is now set correctly. Without this patch > the hi_addr bit is always set to 1, if the second SDRAM bank is > not populated. > > For other MPC5200 boards a correspo

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] arm-imx: Fix registers definition

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > --===1558488003== > > Sync registers definition with linux > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & D

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 0/2] actua1/actua2/actua3: Fix multiple unused variable

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > - actua1: > actux1.c: In function 'checkboard': > actux1.c:92: warning: unused variable 'revision' > > - actua2: > actux2.c: In function 'checkboard': > actux2.c:100: warning: unused variable 's' > actux2.c:99: warning: unus

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Remove the __STRICT_ANSI__ check from the __u64/__s64 declaration on 32bit targets.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The previous patch was lacking of i386, microblaze, nios and nios2. This > patch tries to fix them. > > Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > include/asm-i386/types.h |6 +++--- > include/asm-microblaze/types.h |

[U-Boot-Users] Fat32 cluster size

Hi, I post a patch for fix checking of cluster size in fat32. Currently implementation of vfat support does't work if the referred cluster has an offset > 16bit rapresentation. fatload ide 0:1 fatls etc doesn't work properly. I hope that my patch will be integrated in the u-boot projects Rega

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Makefile: Fix missing unconfig and mkconfig use

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index d6a0299..dbb39e4 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ mecp5200_config: unconfig munices_config:unconfig @$(MKCONFIG) munices ppc mpc5xxx munices -o2dnt

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Altera Stratix II

This is starting to be me talking about my implementation, and though I love being in the spotlight, I think its best for the rest of u-boot mailing list that I will answer more question off line. After I have solved it one way or the other I will simply present my solution and will let you decide

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v5] QE IO: Add initial data to pin configuration + read/write functions

> David Saada wrote: > > On the MPC83xx & MPC85xx architectures that have QE, add initial data to > the > > pin configuration table (qe_iop_conf_tab). This is relevant for GPIO > pins > > defined as output. One can setup a value of -1 to leave the value > unchanged. > > QE initialization tables