[U-Boot-Users] Success after all with S3C2410 and 1.3.2

I gave it one more shot using manually added Openmoko patches (just a few) and using the qt2410.h in configs. I had to adjust a few things then hunt down errors from missing or depricated config_cmd but now its running! Its too bad the openmoko patches weren't snapshotted against a release version

Re: [U-Boot-Users] PCI express NIC for testing?

Hi Wolfgang, what about using a PCIe extension box with a conentional PCI NIC. The EX-1010 (www.exsys.ch) is low cost for such a system. Just an idea. Matthias On Sunday 13 April 2008 09:54:13 Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking for a PCIe card, preferably a NIC, to test PCIe un

Re: [U-Boot-Users] File system

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Gautham K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi , > > I am Gautham here, my kernel is up and running and atlast it gives :- > "Kernel panic unable to mount file system" > Where is your root filesystem present (it could be on NFS server or ramdisk included in kernel image

[U-Boot-Users] File system

Hi , I am Gautham here, my kernel is up and running and atlast it gives :- "Kernel panic unable to mount file system" can anybody tell what may be the problem?? Thanx in advance, Reagards, -- Gautham Neural Systems - This

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Modify Clock rate

Loren A. Linden Levy wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to modify the clock rate in u-boot? I want to > artificially set the clock rate on an m5282 to 32MHz instead of > 66MHz. Thanks for any advice. > > I don't know anything about this CPU at all but I know how to search for things in source code.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for AT91RM9200EK board

Le mardi 15 avril 2008 à 23:35 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit : > > 6) Submit patches for AT91RM9200EK with CFI support and wait for > > community feedback. > >> > > No time, so that won't happen (as I told you). Did you look at what we're talking about ? Adding CFI support means: - re

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for AT91RM9200EK board

> 6) Submit patches for AT91RM9200EK with CFI support and wait for > community feedback. >> No time, so that won't happen (as I told you). >> The flash driver already exists in the AT91RM9200DK board support >> package. > > Yes, this is on the remove list, too. > Fine, Once someone replace

Re: [U-Boot-Users] drivers MMCplus for at91sam9x

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 5:18 AM, Pierre Savary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then my MMC 4GB works with my Linux kernel but if I can't load my kernel > (located on the first part of this MMC) ... it's not really interesting :( > > So, somebody does already use MMC v4 with U-boot??? I've got one t

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix name of i.MX31 boards in config file header

Correct the name of the i.MX31 Litekit and phyCORE boards in config files. Signed-off-by: Magnus Lilja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Corrected the phyCORE name after comment from Robert Schwebel. include/configs/imx31_litekit.h |2 +- include/configs/imx31_phycore.h |2 +- 2 files changed, 2

Re: [U-Boot-Users] drivers MMCplus for at91sam9x

Pierre Savary wrote: > Then my MMC 4GB works with my Linux kernel but if I can't > load my kernel > (located on the first part of this MMC) ... it's not really > interesting :( > So, somebody does already use MMC v4 with U-boot??? Assuming a AT91SAM926x MCI controller: Probably. Given an MMC

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for AT91RM9200EK board

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > I guess you are aware that the merge window is not open, i. e. you are > > submitting this only for discussion here... > > The goal is to have the board included when the merge window reopens. OK, so this submission was for review only. > >> @@ -0,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add build date environment variable

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > >> Add environment for the date when U-Boot is built > > > > It seems that nobody is ever using this variable, so why add it? > > Have other patches in my own u-boot which uses it. > I plan to submit these patches later, but they depend on having othe

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] RTC driver for MC13783

On 13:33 Tue 15 Apr , Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > MC13783 is a multifunction IS with an SPI interface to the host. This > driver handles the RTC controller in this chip. > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- Ack-By Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PR

[U-Boot-Users] Length and girth competition champion

It will grown and grown with our new herbal formula http://www.niebagine.com/ - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use pr

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 04/13] microblaze: add Emaclite ethernet driver

Hi Ben, >> Dear Michal, >> >> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> > >> > this code was sent to mailing list I think twice. I think Grant reviewed >> this >> > code once, didn't he? >> >> Maybe, I don't remember the details. But if Ben had accepted the >> patch, he would have checke

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 2/3] RTC driver for MC13783

MC13783 is a multifunction IS with an SPI interface to the host. This driver handles the RTC controller in this chip. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Changes since v1: update to current git HEAD README|1 + drivers/rtc/Makefile |1 +

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 1/3] New i.MX31 SPI driver

This is an SPI driver for i.MX and MXC based SoCs from Freescale. So far only implemented and tested on i.MX31, can with a modified register layout and definitions be used for i.MX27, I think, MXC CPUs have similar SPI controllers too. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] MX31ADS environment variable update, spi and rtc support

Update MX31ADS default environment to better match the flash layout and the memory map, support SPI and RTC. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/board/mx31ads/mx31ads.c b/board/mx31ads/mx31ads.c index 5a7d8c9..a75cc2d 100644 --- a/board/mx31ads/mx31ads.c ++

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] RTC driver for MC13783

MC13783 is a multifunction IS with an SPI interface to the host. This driver handles the RTC controller in this chip. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/README b/README index 0a04d73..4556e87 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -689,6 +689,7 @@ The followi

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] New i.MX31 SPI driver

This is an SPI driver for i.MX and MXC based SoCs from Freescale. So far only implemented and tested on i.MX31, can with a modified register layout and definitions be used for i.MX27, I think, MXC CPUs have similar SPI controllers too. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

Re: [U-Boot-Users] drivers MMCplus for at91sam9x

Then my MMC 4GB works with my Linux kernel but if I can't load my kernel (located on the first part of this MMC) ... it's not really interesting :( So, somebody does already use MMC v4 with U-boot??? Thanks in advance Pierre -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

Re: [U-Boot-Users] How to configure the MPC8313ERDB to support 2x128MBDDR

> I’m using a customized MPC8313ERDB board, which means we replaced the > Vitesse switch with a second > > Marvell PHY and we are using 64MB of NOR flash instead of 8MB. > > Furthermore we added a second DDR RAM (additional 128MB) on that > board. Did the second DDR RAM module use the other ch

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 3/7] add an i2c driver for mx31

On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > > > Aren't we just moving the #ifdef hell from one place to another? > > > > Wouldn't it be logical to assume, that if CONFIG_I2C_MXC is defined, > > CONFIG_HARD_I2C is meant too? So, we could just put

[U-Boot-Users] How to configure the MPC8313ERDB to support 2x128MB DDR

Hi all, I'm using a customized MPC8313ERDB board, which means we replaced the Vitesse switch with a second Marvell PHY and we are using 64MB of NOR flash instead of 8MB. Furthermore we added a second DDR RAM (additional 128MB) on that board. I adapted U-Boot (v1.3.1) to support the 64MB

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2 v2] Additional PCI IDs for IDE and network controllers

These PCI IDs are required by the Linkstation platforms. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/include/pci_ids.h b/include/pci_ids.h index 5481fff..61c2203 100644 --- a/include/pci_ids.h +++ b/include/pci_ids.h @@ -1472,6 +1472,8 @@ #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ITE_

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for AT91RM9200EK board

> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> >> Add support for the AT91RM9200EK Board. > > I guess you are aware that the merge window is not open, i. e. you are > submitting this only for discussion here... > The goal is to have the board included when the merge window reopens. >> diff -ur