Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] Update Freescale sys_eeprom.c to handle CCID formats

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 05:03:55PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > Sounds complicated and interesting. I might think about it some more > later. Hmm, I don't think that it's really complicated. It's only that it needs yet another arbitrary definition of what certain strings mean - which was a cause fo

[U-Boot-Users] Regarding NAND BOOT support in MPC832x

Dear Sir, We are designing a DSL router based on MPC8323 network processor. We are having two option for booting process NOR as well as NAND but we want implement NAND BOOT in our board. Queries: 1)Is there any version of u-boot that support NAND BOOT for any development board based on MPC832x

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] Update Freescale sys_eeprom.c to handle CCID formats

Robert Schwebel wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 09:59:03AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: >> Update the sys_eeprom.c file to handle both NXID and CCID EEPROM formats. >> The >> NXID format replaces the older CCID format, but it's important to support >> both >> since most boards out there st

[U-Boot-Users] [Patch 5/9 Try 3]U-boot-V2:cmd: add I2C commands

i2cdev command is introduced here. This allows for device creation for doing i2c ops. With tab indents corrected. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Documentation/commands.dox |1 commands/Kconfig |4 commands/i2c.c | 211

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Non-static global variables cause relocation to fail

Timur Tabi wrote: > Jerry Van Baren wrote: [snip] >> I'm guessing from the name "eeprom" that you have a non-zero initializer >> on it??? > > No, no initializer. > >> Does it make a difference if it is uninitialized, initialized >> to {0}, or initialized to non-zero values? > > I don't kno

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fdt: Fix typo in variable name.

Detlev Zundel wrote: > Signed-off-by: Detlev Zundel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > common/fdt_support.c |4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/common/fdt_support.c b/common/fdt_support.c > index e58b294..3828228 100644 > --- a/common/fdt_support.c > +++ b/co

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND testing: chip->state does not always get set.

Fixes an issue with chip->state not always being set causing troubles. Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND: Fix warning due to missing env_ptr casts to u_char * in env_nand.c.

The writeenv() and readenv() calls introduced by the recently added bad block management for environment variables were missing casts therefore producing compile time warnings. While at it fixing some typo in a comment and indentation. Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- common

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] Update Freescale sys_eeprom.c to handle CCID formats

Hi, On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 09:59:03AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > Update the sys_eeprom.c file to handle both NXID and CCID EEPROM formats. The > NXID format replaces the older CCID format, but it's important to support both > since most boards out there still use the CCID format. This change is

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND: Rename DEBUG to MTDDEBUG to avoid namespace pollution.

This is particularly problematic now that non-NAND-specific code is including , and thus all debugging code is being compiled regardless of whether it was requested, as reported by Scott McNutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/nand.c

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] Update Freescale sys_eeprom.c to handle CCID formats

Ben Warren wrote: > So are you saying that the plan is to move much of the configuration > information from NOR flash to I2C EEPROMs on Freescale evaluation > boards? No. The plan is to better support does boards that *do* have MAC addresses in EEPROM. (Actually, I have no idea what the boar

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch 5/9]U-boot-V2:cmd: add I2C commands

Sascha, Summary: Ok, you sold the idea to me. > -Original Message- > From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 10:17 AM > To: Menon, Nishanth > Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Patch 5/9]U-boot-V2:cmd: add I2C commands > +int write_i2

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] Update Freescale sys_eeprom.c to handle CCID formats

Timur Tabi wrote: > Ben Warren wrote: > > >> So are you saying that the plan is to move much of the configuration >> information from NOR flash to I2C EEPROMs on Freescale evaluation >> boards? >> > > No. The plan is to better support does boards that *do* have MAC addresses in > EEPROM

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Non-static global variables cause relocation to fail

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I did notice this code in fsl_i2c.c: > > #ifdef CFG_SPD_BUS_NUM > static unsigned int i2c_bus_num __attribute__ ((section ("data"))) = > CFG_SPD_BUS_NUM; > #else > static unsigned int i2c_bus_num __attribute__ ((section ("data"))) = 0; > #endif > > I