Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: extended cpu identification

2008-07-06 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 5, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> The current cpu identification code is used just to return the name >> of the processor at boot. There are some other locations that the >> name >> is useful (device tree setup). >> >> Also, we add

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: extended cpu identification

2008-07-05 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The current cpu identification code is used just to return the name > of the processor at boot. There are some other locations that the name > is useful (device tree setup). > > Also, we add a feature field to convey useful attributes of the processor.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: extended cpu identification

2008-06-10 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > >> I don't trust our HW guys to keep w/that convention. Plus we can use > >> this mechanism for other things if need be. > > > > they've been pretty good so far, and until the other thing comes > > around, we can compact this table instead of expandin

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: extended cpu identification

2008-06-10 Thread Kim Phillips
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:10:02 -0500 Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 10, 2008, at 8:48 AM, Kim Phillips wrote: > > > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:23:46 -0500 > > Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > >> On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:57 AM, Kim Phillips wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, 29 M

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: extended cpu identification

2008-06-10 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 10, 2008, at 8:48 AM, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:23:46 -0500 > Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:57 AM, Kim Phillips wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 29 May 2008 03:20:08 -0500 (CDT) >>> Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> +struct cpu_ty

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: extended cpu identification

2008-06-10 Thread Kim Phillips
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:23:46 -0500 Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:57 AM, Kim Phillips wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 May 2008 03:20:08 -0500 (CDT) > > Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> +struct cpu_type cpu_type_list [] = { > >> + CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8533, 8533

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: extended cpu identification

2008-06-10 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:57 AM, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2008 03:20:08 -0500 (CDT) > Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> +struct cpu_type cpu_type_list [] = { >> +CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8533, 8533, 0), >> +CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8533, 8533_E, CPU_FTRS_HAS_CRYPTO), >> +CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: extended cpu identification

2008-06-09 Thread Kim Phillips
On Thu, 29 May 2008 03:20:08 -0500 (CDT) Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +struct cpu_type cpu_type_list [] = { > + CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8533, 8533, 0), > + CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8533, 8533_E, CPU_FTRS_HAS_CRYPTO), > + CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8540, 8540, 0), > + CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8541, 8541, 0), > +

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: extended cpu identification

2008-05-29 Thread Kumar Gala
The current cpu identification code is used just to return the name of the processor at boot. There are some other locations that the name is useful (device tree setup). Also, we add a feature field to convey useful attributes of the processor. (for 85xx we have a single feature to tell if the p