Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Haavard Skinnemoen,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > > It may be intended for debug, but it's available there without warning
> > > for the end user.
> >
> > Hang on...end users can compile custom versions of u-boot now? And
>
Dear Haavard,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I wrote:
>
> > The board will most likely still boot, so the "end user" can use other
> > tools to fix the breakage.
>
> How should he, now that console access is disabled?
Just to give you an example how we handle this in other places:
A similar da
Dear Haavard Skinnemoen,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > It may be intended for debug, but it's available there without warning
> > for the end user.
>
> Hang on...end users can compile custom versions of u-boot now? And
Actually yes, they can. This is what GPL software is all ab
Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Jerry Van Baren,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > For what it is worth, I'm with Haavard - it seems useful. WRT the
> > dangerous part - it's intended use is for debug, so presumably it will
>
> It may be intended for debug,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jerry Van Baren,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> For what it is worth, I'm with Haavard - it seems useful. WRT the
>> dangerous part - it's intended use is for debug, so presumably it will
>
> It may be intended for debug, but it's available there w
Dear Jerry Van Baren,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> For what it is worth, I'm with Haavard - it seems useful. WRT the
> dangerous part - it's intended use is for debug, so presumably it will
It may be intended for debug, but it's available there without warning
for the end user
Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi Haavard,
>
>> Mark Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Added CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE_INPUT define.
>>>
>>> When used (in conjunction with CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE) it disables all
>>> console input.
>> Does anyone have an opinion about this? I think it's a nice thing to
>>
Hi Haavard,
> Mark Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Added CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE_INPUT define.
>>
>> When used (in conjunction with CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE) it disables all
>> console input.
>
> Does anyone have an opinion about this? I think it's a nice thing to
> have.
Hm, defining this and
Mark Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Added CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE_INPUT define.
>
> When used (in conjunction with CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE) it disables all console
> input.
Does anyone have an opinion about this? I think it's a nice thing to
have.
Although you should probably update README as
Added CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE_INPUT define.
When used (in conjunction with CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE) it disables all console
input.
---
common/console.c | 10 ++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/console.c b/common/console.c
index 1b095b1..ab071e2 1006
10 matches
Mail list logo
