Hi Ben,
>> Dear Michal,
>>
>> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> >
>> > this code was sent to mailing list I think twice. I think Grant reviewed
>> this
>> > code once, didn't he?
>>
>> Maybe, I don't remember the details. But if Ben had accepted the
>> patch, he would have checke
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Michal,
>
>
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > this code was sent to mailing list I think twice. I think Grant reviewed
> this
> > code once, didn't he?
>
> Maybe, I don't remember the details. B
Dear Michal,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> this code was sent to mailing list I think twice. I think Grant reviewed this
> code once, didn't he?
Maybe, I don't remember the details. But if Ben had accepted the
patch, he would have checked it into the u-boot-net custodian
reposito
Hi Wolfgang,
this code was sent to mailing list I think twice. I think Grant reviewed this
code once, didn't he?
For Ben.
Can you look at drivers/net/xilinx_emac.c and xilinx_emaclite.c?
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I see you sneaked this in via your microblaze custodi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> From: Michal Simek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I see you sneaked this in via your microblaze custodian repo. This was
a Bad Thing, and I ask you not to do such things. You were supposed to
run this through
From: Michal Simek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.c | 351 +
1 files changed, 351 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.c
diff --git a/drivers/ne
