This is starting to be me talking about my implementation, and though
I love being in the spotlight, I think its best for the rest of u-boot
mailing list that I will answer more question off line.
After I have solved it one way or the other I will simply present my
solution and will let you decide
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> In the past I had my own flag I called CONFIG_FORCE_FLASH SIZE.
> Suppose I will come with a way to cripple the CFI to work as it should
> in the latest version, would you like such a feature integrated in the
> u-boot for all?
To be honest - my immed
Hi Liberty,
> I believe I will prefare crippling the CFI over Crippling the flash
> eeprom as I believe it will be easier on our production team... But I
> will have to play with it some more...
If I understand your earlier posts, you are using a CFI
flash, and then 'hiding' half or more of that
Both of you (Wolfgang and Brent) Provided me with some new angle to think of...
I believe I will prefare crippling the CFI over Crippling the flash
eeprom as I believe it will be easier on our production team... But I
will have to play with it some more...
In the past I had my own flag I called C
Brent Cook wrote:
> On Friday 29 February 2008 15:36:59 eran liberty wrote:
>
>> Any attempt to access these non existing address will lead to bus
>> fault exactly as if the flash was a 32Mb (which in many sense it is).
>> So, again, it is important for me to tell u-boot "go ahaed and use
>> CFI
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > I think what you're trying to do is fundamentally broken. Why don't
> > you use the real sizes present on the hardware? Why do you want to
> > lie to yourself and to your users?
>
> I have more then one way to answer this question some are more
On Friday 29 February 2008 15:36:59 eran liberty wrote:
> Any attempt to access these non existing address will lead to bus
> fault exactly as if the flash was a 32Mb (which in many sense it is).
> So, again, it is important for me to tell u-boot "go ahaed and use
> CFI, but dont listen to the eepo
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > As part of my current ongoing effort to get up to date with rc2 I will
> > produce a patch that will apply cleanly against that in a few a days.
>
> In a few days we will have
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> As part of my current ongoing effort to get up to date with rc2 I will
> produce a patch that will apply cleanly against that in a few a days.
In a few days we will have at least -rc3, if not 1.3.2.
> Flash memory size.
> On all the versions till now I
As part of my current ongoing effort to get up to date with rc2 I will
produce a patch that will apply cleanly against that in a few a days.
Hopefully it will be adopted in one go.
If not I will grant others the honor to make it there.
And on another topic (since I am already here):
Flash memory
Hi Eran and Markus,
> I still have my patches and am working (for reasons which are
> connected with the flat device tree & initrd) to make them patch
> cleanly against latest RC. If any want wants them for him self or any
> interested in making the effort to apply them... I will gladly send
> him
First of all,
I still have my patches and am working (for reasons which are
connected with the flat device tree & initrd) to make them patch
cleanly against latest RC. If any want wants them for him self or any
interested in making the effort to apply them... I will gladly send
him/her everything i
On 08:19 Tue 26 Feb , Markus Brunner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen some patches for stratix II support on the Mailinglist, but none
> ended up in the git repository.
> e.g.:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/28559
>
> Where are the problems and what has to be done to br
Hi,
I've seen some patches for stratix II support on the Mailinglist, but none
ended up in the git repository.
e.g.:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/28559
Where are the problems and what has to be done to bring them into u-boot?
Regards
Markus
14 matches
Mail list logo
