In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I cannot find any of the other subjects. For example, where is any
posting that contained the string
fix up comment about CONFIG_BFIN_BOOT_MODE
i can find them just fine with the same exact subject as well as your
replies.
dont know
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
The following changes since commit 1f1554841a4c8e069d331176f0c3059fb2bb8280:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-blackfin.git
On Sunday 01 June 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
The following changes since commit
1f1554841a4c8e069d331176f0c3059fb2bb8280: Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
are available in the git repository at:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
* Major problem: only changes should be used in custodian trees and
submitted as part of a pull request, that had been submitted to the
mailing list before, and for whioch at least no negative comments
all of them have been posted. i dont know
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I expect that the entry in the pull request match the subject of some
posting. Is this not the case? If so, why not?
i really have no idea what you're referring to
You wrote:
Mike Frysinger (14):
Blackfin: make baud calculation more accurate
On Sunday 01 June 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I expect that the entry in the pull request match the subject of some
posting. Is this not the case? If so, why not?
i really have no idea what you're referring to
You wrote:
Mike Frysinger (14):
The following changes since commit 1f1554841a4c8e069d331176f0c3059fb2bb8280:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-blackfin.git review
Mike Frysinger (14):
Blackfin: make
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
The following changes since commit 74d1e66d22dac91388bc538b2fe19f735edc5b82:
Bartlomiej Sieka (1):
Fix host tool build breakage, take two
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-blackfin.git master
Mike
The following changes since commit 74d1e66d22dac91388bc538b2fe19f735edc5b82:
Bartlomiej Sieka (1):
Fix host tool build breakage, take two
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-blackfin.git master
Mike Frysinger (4):
Blackfin: BF537-stamp: cleanup
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
The following changes since commit b8aa57b5d4d69e8f0810a5e632c0ce41c0f46ee0:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
tools/setlocalversion: use a git-describe-ish format
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-blackfin.git master
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
wrt Blackfin, those statements are conflicting. fixing the Blackfin tree
involves major new code. of the changes i posted, only 2 or 3 touch
Then it has to wait until the next merge window. That won't take that
long.
but you dont really care: it's
On 01:35 Sun 24 Feb , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:07:22 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your tree touches common code
Blackfin-specific pieces of common code ... there's a difference
Isn't that a contradiction? If it's blackfin-specific, it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Mike Frysinger (13):
Blackfin: move bootldr command to common code
Blackfin: convert BFIN_CPU to CONFIG_BFIN_CPU
Blackfin: move on-chip MAC driver into drivers/net/
Blackfin: BF537-stamp: drop board-specific flash driver for CFI
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Mike Frysinger (13):
Blackfin: move bootldr command to common code
Blackfin: convert BFIN_CPU to CONFIG_BFIN_CPU
Blackfin: move on-chip MAC driver into drivers/net/
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Mike Frysinger (13):
Blackfin: move bootldr command to common code
Blackfin: convert BFIN_CPU to CONFIG_BFIN_CPU
Blackfin: move on-chip MAC driver into drivers/net/
Blackfin:
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Mike Frysinger (13):
Blackfin: move bootldr command to common code
Blackfin: convert BFIN_CPU to CONFIG_BFIN_CPU
Blackfin: move
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Then that cannot go in now. We would break several rules at once:
patches must be posted to the list first, and new stuff will get
merged only when a merge window is open.
since Blackfin literrally has never compiled/linked in the mainline
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:29:03 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i understand where you're coming from, and i intend to follow the rules ...
after Blackfin in mainline is actually usable. i'm being pragmatic here:
since Blackfin literrally has never compiled/linked in the mainline
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:29:03 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i understand where you're coming from, and i intend to follow the rules
... after Blackfin in mainline is actually usable. i'm being pragmatic
here: since
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Then that cannot go in now. We would break several rules at once:
patches must be posted to the list first, and new stuff will get
merged only when a merge window is open.
since Blackfin
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Still the patches need to be reviewed first.
fair enough. i'd point out for the cpu unification, the patch is 400k and
i'm
not about to go splitting it up just so the mailing list will accept it. if
people actually care, they can read the diff
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:17:34 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ive had no involvement in the past development. if you want to say it sucked
or complain about how it was done, i dont really care. only moving forward
from the current situation matters to me.
I'm not saying it
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ive had no involvement in the past development. if you want to say it
sucked or complain about how it was done, i dont really care. only
moving forward from the current situation matters to me.
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Still the patches need to be reviewed first.
fair enough. i'd point out for the cpu unification, the patch is 400k
and i'm not about to go splitting it up just so the mailing list will
accept
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
you're asking for it to be merged
without any review at all. I don't think that's a good idea.
i'm asking for the Blackfin pieces to be merged regardless of merge window.
I already said no, and I see no reason to reconsider.
i'm making no
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
You want the stuff to go in, so please make it easy for us to review
it.
if you force us to use the mailing list (which is fine), then it should be
This is the rules we agreed on. See
http://www.denx.de/wiki/UBoot/DevelopmentProcess and
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
you're asking for it to be merged
without any review at all. I don't think that's a good idea.
i'm asking for the Blackfin pieces to be merged regardless of merge
window.
I already said no,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:07:22 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's why we do incremental improvements so that you can separate the
fixes from the other stuff and submit them even if there isn't a merge
window open.
it's already been done
Then how come you're still
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's why we do incremental improvements so that you can separate the
fixes from the other stuff and submit them even if there isn't a merge
window open.
it's already been done
Then how
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
the last thread i read you said it was going to stay at 40k and 100k was not
going to happen.
I said I would not change the list's message size limit on the
SourceForge server. Messages that exceed this size (40 kB = that's
what I called
I wrote:
I said I would not change the list's message size limit on the
SourceForge server. Messages that exceed this size (40 kB = that's
what I called soft-limit) need moderation. I will check these, and
unless they are reasonable and below 100 kB I've been ACKimg these
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
of course i have. writing out rules is to codify the spirit of the
process so that people can jump in and know how things works. however,
the point of the rules isnt to have a rigid unchanging
This cleans up and unifies much of the Blackfin cpu/arch directories.
The following changes since commit e5084af8ded58453cd07ec1af8b0f29f34122bbc:
Detlev Zundel (1):
Replace deprecated ramdisk with ramdisk_size kernel parameter.
are available in the git repository at:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
This should get the Blackfin port building/running fine with mainline u-boot
and a bunch of cleanups in the process. More/bigger things to come ...
The following changes since commit 2c5260f711168d5ee91c70ddbb7d897013eefc46:
Ladislav Michl (1):
34 matches
Mail list logo
