Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Anyone know why we pass the image_header_t * to the netbsd loader?
>>
>
> *snip*
>
>> this is some pretty tight coupling with u-boot. Is the stage-2 loader
>> part of u-boot?
>
> I believe this is meant to be NetBSD's last stage bootloader and no
Kumar Gala wrote:
> Anyone know why we pass the image_header_t * to the netbsd loader?
>
*snip*
> this is some pretty tight coupling with u-boot. Is the stage-2 loader
> part of u-boot?
I believe this is meant to be NetBSD's last stage bootloader and not any
U-Boot piece. See for example the
Anyone know why we pass the image_header_t * to the netbsd loader?
/*
* Booting a (NetBSD) kernel image
*
* This process is pretty similar to a standalone application:
* The (first part of an multi-) image must be a stage-2
loader,
* whi
