On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:44:52 -0500
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But since we already have a CONFIG_AVR32 #define, we can clean
> > up the mess in macb.c by simply reversing the logic.
>
> If CONFIG_AVR32 can be used in macb.c without ofuscation, why is
> CONFIG_AT91 needed here? However, "si
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > U-Boot already has too many
> > preprocessor constants and the addition of another (perhaps)
> > dubious one merits more debate.
You omitted the context of this statement and hence most of its meaning.
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> I don't completely agree. U-Bo
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:14:02 -0500
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> U-Boot already has too many
> preprocessor constants and the addition of another (perhaps)
> dubious one merits more debate.
I don't completely agree. U-Boot has too many #ifdefs, which isn't
necessarily the same as too many #defines
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > /* choose RMII or MII mode. This depends on the board */
> > #ifdef CONFIG_RMII
> > #if defined(CONFIG_AT91CAP9) || defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9260) || \
> > -defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9263)
> > +defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9263) || defined(CONFIG_AT91S
