In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> can do, even though I believe it is by far not the best tool to do so.
The definition of "the best tool" depends on many things, including
previous experience and personal preferences.
> The problem is that I would have to use one local branch per f
On Thursday 10 July 2008, Markus Klotzbücher wrote:
> > So is this really the preferred workflow? How are others dealing with
> > this? How to avoid commitlog pollution?
>
> I never used quilt, but I believe stacked git (stgit) implements more or
> less the same behavior on top of git.
Yes, and g
Hi Harald,
Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> can do, even though I believe it is by far not the best tool to do so.
> The problem is that I would have to use one local branch per feature
> (i.e. lots of local branches that need to be kept in sync), and even
> then any incremental changes
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:30:03AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> >
>> > New patch at the end of this mail!
>>
>> Could you please start using git to prepare and send patches? T
