Re: [U-Boot-Users] using a flat device tree to drive u-boot config

2008-08-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: What about creating a tool that parses a device tree and creates (or updates) the board header file? This will retain compatibility with other platforms, clean up the existing header files (they won't need to contain as much information), and

Re: [U-Boot-Users] using a flat device tree to drive u-boot config

2008-08-03 Thread Jon Smirl
On 8/3/08, Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: What about creating a tool that parses a device tree and creates (or updates) the board header file? This will retain compatibility with other platforms, clean up the existing header files

Re: [U-Boot-Users] using a flat device tree to drive u-boot config

2008-08-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: No, no, no. The DTB *must not* be included with the U-Boot image. It shall always be kept separate so we canupdate it independently - otherwise you lose a lot of advantages. A DTB is only about 8K. I was thinking that a user supplied one

Re: [U-Boot-Users] using a flat device tree to drive u-boot config

2008-08-03 Thread Timur Tabi
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the DTB can be at any flash location, you can for example have a fall-back version which is used to bring up U-Boot in a minimal configuration for recovery mode if the new DTB fails to work. I think that a

Re: [U-Boot-Users] using a flat device tree to drive u-boot config

2008-08-03 Thread Grant Likely
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Timur Tabi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the DTB can be at any flash location, you can for example have a fall-back version which is used to bring up U-Boot in a minimal configuration

[U-Boot-Users] El segundo trabajo.

2008-08-03 Thread ben
Me llamo Valeriy Volik. Me director adjunto de la empresa de System Storage Software. Nuestra empresa seocupa en el desarrollo aplicado de la empresa, las sistemas integracionistas, las cadenas corporativas y otras soluciones de software para el negocio, las haciendas y otros tipos de problemas.

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 2/2] i.MX31: Fix mx31_gpio_mux() function and MUX_-macros.

2008-08-03 Thread Magnus Lilja
Correct the mx31_gpio_mux() function to allow changing all i.MX31 IOMUX contacts instead of only the first 256 ones as is the case prior to this patch. Add missing MUX_* macros and update board files to use the new macros. Signed-off-by: Magnus Lilja [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Changes from first

Re: [U-Boot-Users] using a flat device tree to drive u-boot config

2008-08-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: If the DTB can be at any flash location, you can for example have a fall-back version which is used to bring up U-Boot in a minimal configuration for recovery mode if the new DTB fails to work. I think that a recovery DTB would have to be

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot v1.3.4-rc2 released

2008-08-03 Thread Magnus Lilja
Hi, Wolfgang Denk skrev: Hello everybody, I have released U-Boot v1.3.4-rc2, and it is available both from the git repository and the FTP server. Please help testing. Please also check if all your patches that you want to have included in v1.3.4 have really been added - I don't

Re: [U-Boot-Users] using a flat device tree to drive u-boot config

2008-08-03 Thread Timur Tabi
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Better to just not depend on the DTB at all for basic operation. ie. don't brick the board if the DTB is unavailable. Is it even possible to have a recovery mode U-Boot that is not tied to the specific board it's built for?

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please Help me to Setup Send Patch using M$ Office

2008-08-03 Thread Hebbar
Hi all, Hurray I found the solution to linewrap issue in M$ office. http://support.microsoft.com/?id=823921 Thanks for all the feedback and support. Regards Gururaja -- View this message in context:

[U-Boot-Users] Resubmit : [PATCH] Correct ARM Versatile Timer Initialization

2008-08-03 Thread Gururaja Hebbar K R
- According to ARM Dual-Timer Module (SP804) TRM (ARM DDI0271), -- Timer Value Register @ TIMER Base + 4 is Read-only. -- Prescale Value (Bits 3-2 of TIMER Control register) can only be one of 00,01,10. 11 is undefined. Signed-off-by: Gururaja Hebbar [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] (Resubmit) ADD ARM AMBA PL031 RTC Support

2008-08-03 Thread Gururaja Hebbar K R
- Add ARM AMBA PL031 RTC Support Signed-off-by: Gururaja Hebbar [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/rtc/Makefile|1 + drivers/rtc/rtc_pl031.c | 123 +++ 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100755 drivers/rtc/rtc_pl031.c

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fdt: Add simple alias support to fdt print command

2008-08-03 Thread David Gibson
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 08:51:54PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote: Kumar Gala wrote: On Jul 9, 2008, at 12:02 PM, Jerry Van Baren wrote: Thinking out loud... we could define the syntax that a leading * indicates the first part of the path is a dereference of /aliases. Assuming

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fdt: Add simple alias support to fdt print command

2008-08-03 Thread Jerry Van Baren
David Gibson wrote: On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 08:51:54PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote: [snip] I've CC:ed David Gibson in case he has some advice - the concept is to indicate a dereference of /aliases nodes so that us lazy engineers don't have to cut'n'paste the whole long path from the