Dear Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Texas Instruments (OMAP): Dirk Behme?
Or are there any volunteers at TI?
I really like to see someone from TI here, instead.
Looking at some past discussions, I think somebody from TI would be
the best. E.g.:
- While
Oh ... I had a more recent patch, but looks like it didn't make it to the list.
It already fixes a large parts of your comments. Thanks for the review
please use MCI0_BASE and MCI1_BASE so we can detect if the soc support
multiple mci and please move it to soc header
I'll send a patch to clean
fluke56512 wrote:
mini2440 is not cheap for a student in my country.
2009-09-05
I just want to say sorry for this mistake
Cheers,
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 01:47 +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote :
On 10:36 Thu 20 Aug , Albin Tonnerre wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 02:00:45AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote :
On 10:49 Tue 18 Aug , Albin Tonnerre wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at
On 11:03 Sat 05 Sep , Albin Tonnerre wrote:
Oh ... I had a more recent patch, but looks like it didn't make it to the
list.
It already fixes a large parts of your comments. Thanks for the review
please use MCI0_BASE and MCI1_BASE so we can detect if the soc support
multiple mci and
On 22:14 Fri 04 Sep , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Simon Kagstrom,
In message 20090831113210.02299...@marrow.netinsight.se you wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:06:05 +0200
Simon Kagstrom simon.kagst...@netinsight.net wrote:
This update to the patch series just cleans up the commit
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com
---
include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91cap9.h|4
include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9260.h |4
include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9261.h |3 +++
include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9263.h |4
This patch allows to use the atmel_mci SD/MMC driver on the at91 architecture.
It contains:
- initialization code for the MCI controller for all the supported AT91. It
allows the use of only one controller even if a SoC has two controllers
(anyway there's no support for it in atmel_mci as
On 13:20 Sat 05 Sep , Albin Tonnerre wrote:
On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 01:47 +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote :
On 10:36 Thu 20 Aug , Albin Tonnerre wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 02:00:45AM +0200, Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote :
On 10:49 Tue 18 Aug , Albin
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Timur Tabiti...@freescale.com wrote:
After programming a new LAW, we should read-back the LAWAR register so that
we sync the writes. Otherwise, code that attempts to use the new LAW-mapped
memory might fail.
This should say, code that attempts to use the new
On 07:37 Sat 05 Sep , Dirk Behme wrote:
Dear Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
Hi,
Please pull
The following changes since commit 3aa8b68d80dbcb6829af60485c1e388b39af793d:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'next' of ../next
are available in the git
This sets CONFIG_SYS_HZ to 1000 for all boards that use the s3c2400 and
s3c2410 cpu's which fixes various problems such as the timeouts in tftp being
too short.
Tested on an Embest SBC2440-II Board with local u-boot patches as I don't
have any s3c2400 or s3c2410 boards but need this patch
I submitted patches in the last merge window to add support for the Embest
SBC2440-II Board but ran out of time to deal with all of the comments on
the
patches. Because it was a series of 7 patches comments on the early
patches in
the series meant I had to re-work all other patches.
I'd
these boards are built around Atmel's AT91SAM9260/9G20 and have
up to 64MB of NOR flash, up to 128MB of SDRAM, up to 2GB of NAND
and include a 10/100 Ethernet PHY in RMII mode.
Signed-off-by: Eric Benard e...@eukrea.com
---
MAINTAINERS|5 +
MAKEALL
On 16:33 Sat 05 Sep , kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
This sets CONFIG_SYS_HZ to 1000 for all boards that use the s3c2400 and
s3c2410 cpu's which fixes various problems such as the timeouts in tftp being
too short.
Tested on an Embest SBC2440-II Board with local u-boot
Gao Ya'nan wrote:
And how to configure the kernel to minimize the code modification ?
I am porting U-Boot and Linux to a new board with a MPC875 processor
and two serial chips, and U-Boot runs well now. I hear that the FDT
function can tell the kernel devices information more flexibly and
Hi, Jerry.
2009/9/6 Jerry Van Baren gvb.ub...@gmail.com:
Gao Ya'nan wrote:
And how to configure the kernel to minimize the code modification ?
I am porting U-Boot and Linux to a new board with a MPC875 processor
and two serial chips, and U-Boot runs well now. I hear that the FDT
function
17 matches
Mail list logo
